Devir dingo: os limites difusos entre selvagem, feroz e doméstico. Uma abordagem teórica desde a etnografia interespécie

Propõe-se uma abordagem teórica desde a etnografia interespécie, que se complementa com a noção de espécies fenomenológicas. As relações interespécies se ilustram com o caso de como o dingo se transformou em uma espécie particular, mas que precisa das interaçõescom outras. Visto que existe uma ampla discussão sobre se o dingo é um animal selvagem ou doméstico (e se devém de cães ferozes), na primeira parte apresenta-se, brevemente, o que se entende por domesticidade e ferocidade nos cães. Na segunda parte, tratam-se os aspetos gerais do dingo, enquanto na terceira parte salientam-se os laços entre humanos e dingos em perspectiva cultural. Na quarta parte, propõem-se as considerações finais, onde se extrapola o argumento sobre a relação dingo-humano em um horizonte mais amplo e se afirma que devir-dingo implica, do mesmo modo, devir-humano.

Allen, B.L., Fleming, P.J., Allen, L.R., Engeman, R.M., Ballard, G. & Leung, L.K.P. (2013). As clear as mud: a critical review of evidence for the ecological roles of Australian dingoes. Biological Conservation, 159, 158-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.004

Australian Wool Innovation. (2020). National Wild Dog Action Plan. https://wilddogplan.org.au/

Ballard, J.W.O. & Wilson, L.A. (2019). The Australian dingo: untamed or feral? Frontiers in zoology, 16(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-019-0300-6

Bergman, D., Breck, S. W. & Bender, S. (2009). Dogs gone wild: feral dog damage in the United States. Proceedings of the 13th Wildlife Damage Management Conference. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/862/

Boyko, R.H., & Boyko, A.R. (2014). Dog conservation and the population genetic structure of dogs. In M. Gommper (Ed.). Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation (pp. 185-210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Butler, J.R., Linnell, J.D., Morrant, D., Athreya, V., Lescureux, N. & McKeown, A. (2014). Dog eat dog, cat eat dog: social-ecological dimensions of dog predation by wild carnivores. In M. Gommper (Ed.). Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation (pp. 117-143). Oxford: Oxford University Pres.

Claridge, A.W. & Hunt, R. (2008). Evaluating the role of the dingo as a trophic regulator: additional practical suggestions. Ecological Management & Restoration, 9(2), 116-119, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-8903.2008.00402.x

Coppinger, R. & Coppinger, L. (2018). Perros. Una nueva interpretación sobre su origen, comportamiento y evolución. (3ª ed.). Santiago de Compostela: KNS Ediciones.

Corbett, L. (2008). Dingo Canis lupus. In S. Van Dyck & R. Strahan (Eds.). The Mammals of Australia (pp. 737-739). New Holland, Sydney: Chatswood.

Corbett, L. (1995). The Dingo in Australia and Asia. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

Crowther, M. S., Fillios, M., Colman, N. & Letnic, M. (2014). An updated description of the Australian dingo (Canis dingo Meyer, 1793). Journal of Zoology, 293(3), 192-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12134

Daniels, T. & Bekoff, M. (1989). Feralization: the making of wild domestic animals. Behavioural Processes, 19, 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(89)90032-6

Dickman, C.R. & Lunney, D. (2001). Last howl of the dingo: the legislative, ecological and practical issues arising from the kill-or-conserve dilemma. In C. R. Dickman & D.

Lunney (Eds.). A Symposium on the Dingo (pp.95-107). Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales. https://doi.org/10.7882/FS.2001.014

Dupré, J. (1992). Species: Theoretical Contexts. In E.F. Keller & E.A. Lloyd (Eds.). Keywords in Evolutionary Biology (pp. 312-317). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Fijn, N. (2018). Dog ears and tails. Different ways of being with canines in aboriginal Australia and Mongolia. In H. Swanson, M. Lien & G. Ween (Eds.). Domestication gone wild. Politics and practices of multispecies relations (pp. 1-30). Durham & London: Duke University Press.

Fleming, P.J., Allen, B.L. & Ballard, G.A. (2012). Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia. Australian Mammalogy, 34(1). 119-131. https://doi.org/10.1071/AM11012

Foster, C.N., Barton, P.S. & Lindenmayer, D.B. (2014). Effects of large native herbivores on other animals. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, 929–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12268

Fuentes, A. & Kohn, E. (2012). Two proposals. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 30(2), 136-146. https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2012.300209

Gering, E., Incorvaia, D., Henriksen, R., Conner, J., Getty, T. & Wright, D. (2019).

Getting Back to Nature: Feralization in Animals and Plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 34(12), 1137-1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.07.018

Ghiselin, M.T. (1974). A Radical Solution to the Species Problem. Systematic Zoology, 23(4), 536-544. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412471

Ghiselin, M.T. (1997). Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Gilbert, S.F. (2014). A holobiont birth narrative: the epigenetic transmission of the human microbiome. Frontiers in genetics, 5, 282. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00282

Glen, A.S. (2010). Hybridisation between dingoes and domestic dogs: a comment on Jones (2009). Australian Mammalogy, 32(1), 76-77. https://doi.org/10.1071/AM09031

Glen, A.S. & Dickman, C. R. (2005). Complex interactions among mammalian carnivores in Australia, and their implications for wildlife management. Biological reviews, 80(3), 387-401, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1464793105006718

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2016). Individuality, subjectivity, and minimal cognition. Biology & Philosophy, 31, 775-796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9543-1

Gompper, M.E. (2014). The dog-human-wildlife interface: assessing the scope of the problem. In M. E. Gommper (Ed.). Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation (pp. 9-54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Green, J. & Gipson, P. (1994). Feral dogs. The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage, 35, 77-82. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmhandbook/35/

Gunn, R.G., Whear, R.L., & Douglas, L.C. (2010). A dingo burial from the Arnhem Land Plateau. Australian Archaeology, 71(1),11-16, https://doi.org/10.1080/03122417.2010.11689380

Hacking, I. (1991). A Tradition of Natural Kinds. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 61(1/2), 109-126. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4320173

Hacking, I. (1990). Natural Kinds. In R.B. Barrett, & R. Gibson (Eds.). Perspectives on Quine (pp.129-141). Oxford: Blackwell.

Haraway. D. (2019). Cuando las especies se encuentran. Introducciones. Tabula Rasa, 31, 23-75. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n31.02

Haraway. D. (2016). Manifiesto de las especies de compañía. Buenos Aires: Sans Soleil Ediciones.

Haraway, D. (2008). When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Hughes, J. & Macdonald, D.W. (2013). A review of the interactions between freeroaming domestic dogs and wildlife. Biological Conservation, 157, 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.005

Hull, D.L. (1976). Are Species Really Individuals? Systematic Zoology, 25, 174-191. https://doi.org/10.2307 / 2412744

Hytten, K. (2009). Dingo dualisms: exploring the ambiguous identity of Australian dingoes. Australian Zoologist, 35(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2009.003

Ingold, T. (2013). Anthropology Beyond Humanity. Suomen Antropologi /Journal of the Finnish Anthropology Society, 38(3), 15-23. https://abdn.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/anthropology-beyond-humanity

Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.

Jackson, S.M., Groves, C., Fleming, P.J.S., Aplin, K.P., Eldridge, M.D.B., Gonzalez, A. & Helgen, K.M. (2017). The wayward dog: Is the Australian native dog or dingo a distinct species? Zootaxa, 4317(2), 201-224. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4317.2.1

Kirksey, S.E. & Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x

Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Koungoulos, L. & Fillios, M. (2020). Between Ethnography and Prehistory: The Case of the Australian Dingo. In B. Bethke & A. Burtt (Eds.). Dogs: Archaeology Beyond Domestication (pp.206-231). Gainesville: University of Florida Press.

Letnic, M. & Crowther, M.S. (2013). Patterns in the abundance of kangaroo populations in arid Australia are consistent with the exploitation ecosystems hypothesis. Oikos, 122, 761-769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012. 20425.x

Lien, M.E., Swanson, H.A. & Ween, G.B. (2018). Introduction. Naming the Beast—Exploring the Otherwise. In H. Swanson, M. Lien & G. Ween (Eds.). Domestication Gone Wild (pp. 1-30). Durham & London: Duke University Press.

Livingston, J. & Puar, J. (2011). Interspecies. Social Text, 29(1). 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-1210237

Locke, P. & Muenster, U. (2018). Multispecies Ethnography. Oxford Bibliographies. https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199766567-0130

Maclaurin, J. & Sterelny, K. (2008). What Is Biodiversity? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Miller, K.K., Ritchie, E.G. & Weston, M.A. (2014). The human dimensions of dogwildlife interactions. In M. Gommper (Ed.). Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation (pp.286-301). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Morrant, D.S., Johnson, C.N., Butler, J.R. & Congdon, B.C. (2017). Biodiversity friend or foe: Land use by a top predator, the dingo in contested landscapes of the Australian Wet Tropics. Austral Ecology, 42(3), 252-264, https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12427

Newsome, A.E. & Corbett, L.K. (1982). The identity of the dingo II. Hybridization with domestic dogs in captivity and in the wild. Australian Journal of Zoology, 30(2), 365-374, https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO9820365

Nimmo, D.G., Watson, S.J., Forsyth, D.M. & Bradshaw, C.J. (2015). Dingoes can help conserve wildlife and our methods can tell. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52(2), 281-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12369

Nowicki, S. (2014). You don’t own me: feral dogs and the question of ownership. Animal Law, 21(1), 1-27. https://www.animallaw.info/article/you-don%E2%80%99t-own-meferal-dogs-and-question-ownership

O’Malley, M. & Dupré, J., (2007). Size doesn’t matter: towards a more inclusive philosophy of Biology. Biology and Philosophy, 22, 155-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9031-0

Ogden, L.A., Hall, B. & Tanita, K. (2013). Animals, plants, people, and things: A review of multispecies ethnography. Environment and society, 4(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2013.040102

Pigliucci, M. (2003). Species as family resemblance concepts: the (dis-)solution of the species problem? BioEssays, 25, 596-602. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.10284

Price, E. O. (1984). Behavioral aspects of animal domestication. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 59(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1086/413673

Ritchie, E.G., Dickman, C.R., Letnic, M., Vanak, A.T. & Gommper, M. (2014). Dogs as predators and trophic regulators. In M. Gommper (ed.). Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation (pp. 55-68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rose, D.B. (2011). Wild dog dreaming. Love and extinction. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press.

Rose, D.B. (1992). Dingo Makes Us Human: Life and Land in an Aboriginal Australian Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Savolainen, P., Leitner T., Wilton, A., Matisoo-Smith, E. & Lundeberg, J. (2004). A detailed picture of the origin of the Australian dingo, obtained from the study of mitochondrial DNA. PNAS, 101(33), 12387-12390. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401814101

Shipman, P. (2020). What the dingo says about dog domestication. The Anatomical Record, 304, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.24517

Smith, B.P. (Ed.). (2015). The dingo debate: origins, behaviour and conservation. Clayton South: CSIRO Publishing.

Smith, B.P. & Appleby, R.G. (2018). Promoting human–dingo co-existence in Australia: moving towards more innovative methods of protecting livestock rather than killing dingoes (Canis dingo). Wildlife Research, 45(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16161

Smith, B.P. & Litchfield, C. (2009). A Review of the Relationship between Indigenous Australians, Dingoes (Canis dingo) and Domestic Dogs (Canis familiaris). Anthrozoös, 22(2), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303709X434149

Smith, B.P., Cairns, K.M., Adams, J.W., Newsome, T.M., Fillios, M., Deaux, E.C. & Crowther, M.S. (2019). Taxonomic status of the Australian dingo: the case for Canis dingo Meyer, 1793. Zootaxa, 4564(1), 173-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4564.1.6

Sterelny, K. (1999). Species as Ecological Mosaics. In R. Wilson (Ed.). Species. New Interdisciplinary Essays (pp. 119-138). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Swanson, H., Lien, M. & Ween, G. (Eds.). (2018). Domestication gone wild. Politics and practices of multispecies relations. Durham & London: Duke University Press.

Taçon, P.S. (2008). Rainbow colour and power among the Waanyi of northwest Queensland. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(2), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774308000231

Taçon, P.S. & Pardoe, C. (2002). Dogs Make Us Human. Nature Australia, 27(4), 53-61.

Tsing, A.L. (2018). Nine provocations for the study of domestication. In H. Swanson, M. Lien & G. Ween (Eds.). Domestication gone wild. Politics and practices of multispecies relations (pp.231-251). Durham & London: Duke University Press.

Tsing, A.L. (2012). Unruly Edges: Mushrooms as Companion Species. Environmental Humanities, 1(1), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3610012 van Eeden, L., Dickman, C., Crowther, M. & Newsome, T. (2021). A Theory of Change for promoting coexistence between dingoes and livestock production. Conservation Science and Practice, 3(3), e304. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.304

Vanak, A. & Gompper, M. (2009). Dogs Canis familiaris as carnivores: their role and function in intraguild competition. Mammal Review, 39(4), 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2009.00148.x

Visser, R.L., Watson, J.E., Dickman, C.R., Southgate, R., Jenkins, D. & Johnson, C.N. (2009). A national framework for research on trophic regulation by the Dingo in Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology, 15(3), 209-216. https://doi.org/10.1071/PC090209