Becoming a Dingo: The Blurred Boundaries Between the Wild, Feral, and Tame. A Theoretical Approach from Interspecies Ethnography
Devenir dingo: los límites difusos entre salvaje, feral y doméstico. Un abordaje teórico desde la etnografía interespecie
Show authors biography
We address a theoretical analysis within the framework of interspecies ethnography and complete it with the notion of phenomenological species. Interspecies relationships are illustrated in the case of how dingo dogs have become a particular species but a species needing interaction with others. As there is a big debate about dingoes being a wild or a tame animal (and if it comes from feral dogs), the first section briefly defines domesticity and ferality in dogs. The second deals with general aspects of dingoes, while the third one focuses on the cultural links between humans and dingoes. The fourth and last section presents the final considerations, extrapolating dingo-human relations to a broader spectrum and pointing out that becoming dingo implies becoming human.
Article visits 152 | PDF visits 80
Downloads
Allen, B.L., Fleming, P.J., Allen, L.R., Engeman, R.M., Ballard, G. & Leung, L.K.P. (2013). As clear as mud: a critical review of evidence for the ecological roles of Australian dingoes. Biological Conservation, 159, 158-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.004
Australian Wool Innovation. (2020). National Wild Dog Action Plan. https://wilddogplan.org.au/
Ballard, J.W.O. & Wilson, L.A. (2019). The Australian dingo: untamed or feral? Frontiers in zoology, 16(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-019-0300-6
Bergman, D., Breck, S. W. & Bender, S. (2009). Dogs gone wild: feral dog damage in the United States. Proceedings of the 13th Wildlife Damage Management Conference. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/862/
Boyko, R.H., & Boyko, A.R. (2014). Dog conservation and the population genetic structure of dogs. In M. Gommper (Ed.). Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation (pp. 185-210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Butler, J.R., Linnell, J.D., Morrant, D., Athreya, V., Lescureux, N. & McKeown, A. (2014). Dog eat dog, cat eat dog: social-ecological dimensions of dog predation by wild carnivores. In M. Gommper (Ed.). Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation (pp. 117-143). Oxford: Oxford University Pres.
Claridge, A.W. & Hunt, R. (2008). Evaluating the role of the dingo as a trophic regulator: additional practical suggestions. Ecological Management & Restoration, 9(2), 116-119, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-8903.2008.00402.x
Coppinger, R. & Coppinger, L. (2018). Perros. Una nueva interpretación sobre su origen, comportamiento y evolución. (3ª ed.). Santiago de Compostela: KNS Ediciones.
Corbett, L. (2008). Dingo Canis lupus. In S. Van Dyck & R. Strahan (Eds.). The Mammals of Australia (pp. 737-739). New Holland, Sydney: Chatswood.
Corbett, L. (1995). The Dingo in Australia and Asia. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
Crowther, M. S., Fillios, M., Colman, N. & Letnic, M. (2014). An updated description of the Australian dingo (Canis dingo Meyer, 1793). Journal of Zoology, 293(3), 192-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12134
Daniels, T. & Bekoff, M. (1989). Feralization: the making of wild domestic animals. Behavioural Processes, 19, 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(89)90032-6
Dickman, C.R. & Lunney, D. (2001). Last howl of the dingo: the legislative, ecological and practical issues arising from the kill-or-conserve dilemma. In C. R. Dickman & D.
Lunney (Eds.). A Symposium on the Dingo (pp.95-107). Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales. https://doi.org/10.7882/FS.2001.014
Dupré, J. (1992). Species: Theoretical Contexts. In E.F. Keller & E.A. Lloyd (Eds.). Keywords in Evolutionary Biology (pp. 312-317). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fijn, N. (2018). Dog ears and tails. Different ways of being with canines in aboriginal Australia and Mongolia. In H. Swanson, M. Lien & G. Ween (Eds.). Domestication gone wild. Politics and practices of multispecies relations (pp. 1-30). Durham & London: Duke University Press.
Fleming, P.J., Allen, B.L. & Ballard, G.A. (2012). Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia. Australian Mammalogy, 34(1). 119-131. https://doi.org/10.1071/AM11012
Foster, C.N., Barton, P.S. & Lindenmayer, D.B. (2014). Effects of large native herbivores on other animals. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, 929–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12268
Fuentes, A. & Kohn, E. (2012). Two proposals. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 30(2), 136-146. https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2012.300209
Gering, E., Incorvaia, D., Henriksen, R., Conner, J., Getty, T. & Wright, D. (2019).
Getting Back to Nature: Feralization in Animals and Plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 34(12), 1137-1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.07.018
Ghiselin, M.T. (1974). A Radical Solution to the Species Problem. Systematic Zoology, 23(4), 536-544. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412471
Ghiselin, M.T. (1997). Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Gilbert, S.F. (2014). A holobiont birth narrative: the epigenetic transmission of the human microbiome. Frontiers in genetics, 5, 282. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00282
Glen, A.S. (2010). Hybridisation between dingoes and domestic dogs: a comment on Jones (2009). Australian Mammalogy, 32(1), 76-77. https://doi.org/10.1071/AM09031
Glen, A.S. & Dickman, C. R. (2005). Complex interactions among mammalian carnivores in Australia, and their implications for wildlife management. Biological reviews, 80(3), 387-401, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1464793105006718
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2016). Individuality, subjectivity, and minimal cognition. Biology & Philosophy, 31, 775-796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9543-1
Gompper, M.E. (2014). The dog-human-wildlife interface: assessing the scope of the problem. In M. E. Gommper (Ed.). Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation (pp. 9-54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Green, J. & Gipson, P. (1994). Feral dogs. The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage, 35, 77-82. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmhandbook/35/
Gunn, R.G., Whear, R.L., & Douglas, L.C. (2010). A dingo burial from the Arnhem Land Plateau. Australian Archaeology, 71(1),11-16, https://doi.org/10.1080/03122417.2010.11689380
Hacking, I. (1991). A Tradition of Natural Kinds. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 61(1/2), 109-126. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4320173
Hacking, I. (1990). Natural Kinds. In R.B. Barrett, & R. Gibson (Eds.). Perspectives on Quine (pp.129-141). Oxford: Blackwell.
Haraway. D. (2019). Cuando las especies se encuentran. Introducciones. Tabula Rasa, 31, 23-75. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n31.02
Haraway. D. (2016). Manifiesto de las especies de compañía. Buenos Aires: Sans Soleil Ediciones.
Haraway, D. (2008). When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hughes, J. & Macdonald, D.W. (2013). A review of the interactions between freeroaming domestic dogs and wildlife. Biological Conservation, 157, 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.005
Hull, D.L. (1976). Are Species Really Individuals? Systematic Zoology, 25, 174-191. https://doi.org/10.2307 / 2412744
Hytten, K. (2009). Dingo dualisms: exploring the ambiguous identity of Australian dingoes. Australian Zoologist, 35(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2009.003
Ingold, T. (2013). Anthropology Beyond Humanity. Suomen Antropologi /Journal of the Finnish Anthropology Society, 38(3), 15-23. https://abdn.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/anthropology-beyond-humanity
Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.
Jackson, S.M., Groves, C., Fleming, P.J.S., Aplin, K.P., Eldridge, M.D.B., Gonzalez, A. & Helgen, K.M. (2017). The wayward dog: Is the Australian native dog or dingo a distinct species? Zootaxa, 4317(2), 201-224. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4317.2.1
Kirksey, S.E. & Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x
Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Koungoulos, L. & Fillios, M. (2020). Between Ethnography and Prehistory: The Case of the Australian Dingo. In B. Bethke & A. Burtt (Eds.). Dogs: Archaeology Beyond Domestication (pp.206-231). Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
Letnic, M. & Crowther, M.S. (2013). Patterns in the abundance of kangaroo populations in arid Australia are consistent with the exploitation ecosystems hypothesis. Oikos, 122, 761-769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012. 20425.x
Lien, M.E., Swanson, H.A. & Ween, G.B. (2018). Introduction. Naming the Beast—Exploring the Otherwise. In H. Swanson, M. Lien & G. Ween (Eds.). Domestication Gone Wild (pp. 1-30). Durham & London: Duke University Press.
Livingston, J. & Puar, J. (2011). Interspecies. Social Text, 29(1). 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-1210237
Locke, P. & Muenster, U. (2018). Multispecies Ethnography. Oxford Bibliographies. https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199766567-0130
Maclaurin, J. & Sterelny, K. (2008). What Is Biodiversity? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Miller, K.K., Ritchie, E.G. & Weston, M.A. (2014). The human dimensions of dogwildlife interactions. In M. Gommper (Ed.). Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation (pp.286-301). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morrant, D.S., Johnson, C.N., Butler, J.R. & Congdon, B.C. (2017). Biodiversity friend or foe: Land use by a top predator, the dingo in contested landscapes of the Australian Wet Tropics. Austral Ecology, 42(3), 252-264, https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12427
Newsome, A.E. & Corbett, L.K. (1982). The identity of the dingo II. Hybridization with domestic dogs in captivity and in the wild. Australian Journal of Zoology, 30(2), 365-374, https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO9820365
Nimmo, D.G., Watson, S.J., Forsyth, D.M. & Bradshaw, C.J. (2015). Dingoes can help conserve wildlife and our methods can tell. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52(2), 281-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12369
Nowicki, S. (2014). You don’t own me: feral dogs and the question of ownership. Animal Law, 21(1), 1-27. https://www.animallaw.info/article/you-don%E2%80%99t-own-meferal-dogs-and-question-ownership
O’Malley, M. & Dupré, J., (2007). Size doesn’t matter: towards a more inclusive philosophy of Biology. Biology and Philosophy, 22, 155-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9031-0
Ogden, L.A., Hall, B. & Tanita, K. (2013). Animals, plants, people, and things: A review of multispecies ethnography. Environment and society, 4(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2013.040102
Pigliucci, M. (2003). Species as family resemblance concepts: the (dis-)solution of the species problem? BioEssays, 25, 596-602. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.10284
Price, E. O. (1984). Behavioral aspects of animal domestication. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 59(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1086/413673
Ritchie, E.G., Dickman, C.R., Letnic, M., Vanak, A.T. & Gommper, M. (2014). Dogs as predators and trophic regulators. In M. Gommper (ed.). Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation (pp. 55-68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rose, D.B. (2011). Wild dog dreaming. Love and extinction. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press.
Rose, D.B. (1992). Dingo Makes Us Human: Life and Land in an Aboriginal Australian Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Savolainen, P., Leitner T., Wilton, A., Matisoo-Smith, E. & Lundeberg, J. (2004). A detailed picture of the origin of the Australian dingo, obtained from the study of mitochondrial DNA. PNAS, 101(33), 12387-12390. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401814101
Shipman, P. (2020). What the dingo says about dog domestication. The Anatomical Record, 304, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.24517
Smith, B.P. (Ed.). (2015). The dingo debate: origins, behaviour and conservation. Clayton South: CSIRO Publishing.
Smith, B.P. & Appleby, R.G. (2018). Promoting human–dingo co-existence in Australia: moving towards more innovative methods of protecting livestock rather than killing dingoes (Canis dingo). Wildlife Research, 45(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16161
Smith, B.P. & Litchfield, C. (2009). A Review of the Relationship between Indigenous Australians, Dingoes (Canis dingo) and Domestic Dogs (Canis familiaris). Anthrozoös, 22(2), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303709X434149
Smith, B.P., Cairns, K.M., Adams, J.W., Newsome, T.M., Fillios, M., Deaux, E.C. & Crowther, M.S. (2019). Taxonomic status of the Australian dingo: the case for Canis dingo Meyer, 1793. Zootaxa, 4564(1), 173-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4564.1.6
Sterelny, K. (1999). Species as Ecological Mosaics. In R. Wilson (Ed.). Species. New Interdisciplinary Essays (pp. 119-138). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Swanson, H., Lien, M. & Ween, G. (Eds.). (2018). Domestication gone wild. Politics and practices of multispecies relations. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
Taçon, P.S. (2008). Rainbow colour and power among the Waanyi of northwest Queensland. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(2), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774308000231
Taçon, P.S. & Pardoe, C. (2002). Dogs Make Us Human. Nature Australia, 27(4), 53-61.
Tsing, A.L. (2018). Nine provocations for the study of domestication. In H. Swanson, M. Lien & G. Ween (Eds.). Domestication gone wild. Politics and practices of multispecies relations (pp.231-251). Durham & London: Duke University Press.
Tsing, A.L. (2012). Unruly Edges: Mushrooms as Companion Species. Environmental Humanities, 1(1), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3610012 van Eeden, L., Dickman, C., Crowther, M. & Newsome, T. (2021). A Theory of Change for promoting coexistence between dingoes and livestock production. Conservation Science and Practice, 3(3), e304. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.304
Vanak, A. & Gompper, M. (2009). Dogs Canis familiaris as carnivores: their role and function in intraguild competition. Mammal Review, 39(4), 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2009.00148.x
Visser, R.L., Watson, J.E., Dickman, C.R., Southgate, R., Jenkins, D. & Johnson, C.N. (2009). A national framework for research on trophic regulation by the Dingo in Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology, 15(3), 209-216. https://doi.org/10.1071/PC090209