Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Dog Entanglements: Big Game Hounds in Uruguay from the View of Varied Social Collectives

Enredos perrunos: el perro de caza mayor en Uruguay desde diferentes colectivos sociales




Section
Artículos

How to Cite
Dog Entanglements: Big Game Hounds in Uruguay from the View of Varied Social Collectives. (2022). Tabula Rasa, 40, 99-122. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n40.05

Dimensions
PlumX
Leticia Poliak Author
Juan Martín Dabezies Author

Dogs are critical elements in the practice of various modalities of big game. They are primarily used in wild boar hunting, in which dogs often are dead or injured. In this line of thought, some social collectives are against using hounds in hunting, arguing it entails a high risk for dog welfare or its severe impact on native species conservation efforts. This work focuses on the significance of big game hounds among various social collectives in Uruguay. We analyze the meanings of dogs in this social scheme and the strains between hunters, animal rights collectives, and the State. We suggest big game hounds resulted from an entanglement of practices and representations related to game, animal rights, and nature conservation.


Article visits 172 | PDF visits 140


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Arluke A. (2006). Just a dog: understanding animal cruelty and ourselves. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Blaser M. (2019). Reflexiones sobre la ontología política de los conflictos medioambientales. América Crítica, 3(2), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.13125/americacritica/3991

Blaser, M. (2013) Ontological Conflicts and the Stories of People in Spite of Europe. Current Anthropology, 54(5), 547-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/672270

Blaser M. (2009). La ontología política de un programa de caza sustentable. Revista red de antropologías del mundo, 4, 81-108. http://ram-wan.net/old/documents/05_e_Journal/journal-4/jwan4.pdf

Byrd, E., Lee, J.G. & Widmar, N. (2017). Perceptions of Hunting and Hunters by U.S. Respondents. Animals, 7(11), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7110083

Calarco, M. (2008). Zoographies: The Question of the Animal froHeidegger to Derrida. New York: Columbia University Press.

Carman, M. (2017). El activismo proteccionista, o las disímiles imputaciones de dignidad a animales y humanos. Etnografías Contemporáneas, 3(4), 128-155. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/bitstream/handle/11336/76852/CONICET_Digital_Nro.6268c2ed-7350-4adfb85c-3a2aa2de1518_A.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y

Change.org (2018). Prohibir la caza en Uruguay, #stopcazauy. https://www.change.org/p/diputadosuy-tabarevazquez-scpresidenciauy-prohibir-la-caza-en-uruguaystopcazauy?fbclid=IwAR3qcbeWSWSScd3_kTWfEXxynHgWmbl0yta2hCLa54_wJGGd_wefb90bZSk

Cotryba (2020). Comisión Tenencia Responsable y Bienestar Animal. http://www.mgap.gub.uy/unidad-organizativa/comision-de-tenencia-responsable-y-bienestar-animal.

Dabezies, J. (2019). Discursos y tensiones entre caza, conservación y derechos de los animales en Uruguay. Etnobiología, 17(2), 11-24. https://revistaetnobiologia.mx/index.php/etno/article/view/106

De la Cadena, M. (2015). Earth Beings. Ecologies of Practice across Andean Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.

De la Cadena, M. (2010). Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes.Conceptual Reflections beyond Politics. Cultural Anthropology, 25(2), 334-370. https://www.humanities.uci.edu/critical/pdf/cadena.pdf

Descola, P. (2009). Human Natures. Social Anthropology, 17(2), 145-157.

Descola, P. (1996). La selva oculta. Simbolismo y praxis en la ecología de los achuar. Quito: Abya Yala. Colección Pueblos del Ecuador.

Diegues, A. (2008). O mito moderno da naturaleza intocada. São Paulo: Hucitec.

Escobar, A. (2012). Más allá del tercer mundo. Globalización y diferencia. Bogotá: Icanh–Universidad del Cauca.

Fischer, A., Kereži, V., Arroyo, B., Mateos-Delibes, M., Tadie, D., Lowassa, A. & Skogen, K. (2013). (De)legitimising hunting–Discourses over the morality of hunting in Europe and eastern Africa. Land Use Policy, 32, 261-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.11.002

Kohn, E. (2017). How Dogs Dream… Diez años después. AIBR: Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 12(3), 273-311. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=62354698002

Latour, B. (2008). Reensamblar lo social: una introducción a la teoría del actor-red. Buenos Aires: Manantial.

Libera Asociación Animalista (2020). Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/Stop-CazaUY-479734012444197/

Marvin, G. (2003). A passionate pursuit: foxhunting as performance. The Sociological Review 51, pp. 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00450.x

Masjoán J. (2010). Historia del dogo argentino, antigua, moderna y contemporánea, 1930/2009. Buenos Aires: Gráficamente Ediciones.

Medrano, C. (2016). Hacer a un perro. Relaciones entre los Qom del Gran Chaco argentino y sus compañeros animales de caza. Anthropos, 111(3), 113-125.

Milton, K (2002). Loving Nature. Towards an Ecology of Emotion. London: Routledge.

Montero, S. (2019). Encuentros de vida y muerte. Antropología transespecie y mundos ampliados entre cazadores y animales en el suroeste extremeño. (Tesis de grado). Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla.

Rodríguez R. (2019). Lo animal es político. La Diaria. https://ladiaria.com.uy/opinion/articulo/2019/11/lo-animal-es-politico/

Ruiz Serna, D. & Del Cairo, C. (2016). Los debates del giro ontológico en torno al naturalismo moderno. Revista de Estudios Sociales, 55, 193-204. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/res/n55/n55a16.pdf

Singer, P. (1999). Liberación animal. Madrid: Trotta.

Stengers, I. (2005). The cosmopolitical proposal. In B. Latour & P. Weibel (Eds.). Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy (pp.994-1004). Massachussetts: Massachussetts Institute of Technology Press.

Stengers, I. (2000). The Invention of Modern Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Tola, F. (2007). Eu não estou só(mente) em meu corpo? A pessoa e o corpo entre os Toba (Qom) do Chaco argentino. Mana, 13(2), 499-519. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-93132007000200008

Vander Velden, F. F. (2016). Como se faz um cachorro caçador entre os Karitiana (Rondônia). En: Teoria e Cultura, 11(2). https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/TeoriaeCultura/article/view/12281

Viveiros de Castro E. (2019). Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America, 2(1), https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/tipiti/vol2/iss1/1/?utm_source=digitalcommons.trinity.edu%2Ftipiti%2Fvol2%2Fiss1%2F1&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |