Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

De la crueldad animal a la dominación social interespecie y el autoritarismo: una revisión teórica desde la psicología social

From animal cruelty to interspecies social domination and authoritarianism: A theoretical review from social psychology



Abrir | Descargar

Cómo citar
De la crueldad animal a la dominación social interespecie y el autoritarismo: una revisión teórica desde la psicología social. (2024). Tabula Rasa, 49, 151-178. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n49.09

Dimensions
PlumX
Juan José Ponce León Autor/a

Este artículo busca presentar un debate teórico contemporáneo, a partir de una extensa revisión de literatura especializada, en el campo de la psicología social y política sobre la configuración del prejuicio y la dominación interespecie —especismo— y entre grupos sociales humanos, así como su irreductible imbricación analítica. Para ello, este texto se divide en tres apartados. En el primero, a modo de introducción se presentan investigaciones pioneras desde el campo de la psicología y la criminología, las que a partir de los años ochenta empezaron el estudio de la relación entre la crueldad hacia los animales y la violencia interpersonal. En el segundo, se esbozan los modelos teóricos más relevantes para el estudio del especismo, que toman como base la teoría de la dominación social, junto con otras categorías analíticas relevantes como: estrés traumático inducido por perpetración, estrés moral y adormecimiento psíquico, que permiten explicar procesos psicosociales subyacentes a la violencia especista. Finalmente, se expone la masculinización de este tipo de violencia y los mecanismos de genderización detrás de la dominación social


Visitas del artículo 203 | Visitas PDF 102


Descargas

Los datos de descarga todavía no están disponibles.
  1. Adams, C. J. (2016). La política sexual de la carne. Ochodoscuatro ediciones.
  2. Adams, C. J. (1991). Ecofeminism and the Eating of Animals. Hypatia, 6(1), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00213.x
  3. Agnew, R. (1998). The causes of animal abuse: A social-psychological analysis. Theoretical Criminology, 2(2), 177–209. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315093390-4
  4. Akrami, N., Ekehammar, B., & Bergh, R. (2011). Generalized prejudice: Common and specific components. Psychological Science, 22(1), 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610390384 .
  5. Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-Wing Authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.
  6. Amiot, C. E., & Bastian, B. (2015). Toward a Psychology of Human-Animal Relations. Psychological Bulletin, 141(1), 6–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038147
  7. Arluke, A. (1994). Managing Emotions in an Animal Shelter. In A. Manning & J. Serpell (Eds.), Animals & Society: Changing Perspectives (pp. 145–165). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203421444-11
  8. Arluke, A., Luke, C., & Ascione, F. (1999). The Relationship of Animal Abuse to Violence and Other Forms of Antisocial Behavior. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9(14), 963–975. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/088626099014009004
  9. Ascione, F. R. (1998). Battered Women’s Reports of Their Partners’ and Their Children’s Cruelty to Animals. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1(1), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1300/J135v01n01_06
  10. Ascione, F. R. (2001, September). Animal Abuse and Human Violence. U.S. Department of Justice, 1–15.
  11. Ascione, F. R. (1993). Children Who are Cruel to Animals: A Review of Research and Implications for Developmental Psychopathology. Anthrozoös, 6(4), 226–247. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279393787002105
  12. Ascione, F. R., Weber, C. V., & Wood, D. S. (1997). The Abuse of Animals and Domestic Violence: A National Survey of Shelters for Women who are Battered. Society and Animals, 5(3), 205–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/156853097X00132
  13. Baldry, A. C. (2003). Animal Abuse and Exposure to Interparental Violence in Italian Youth. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(3), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260502250081
  14. Baran, B. E., Rogelberg, S. G., & Clausen, T. (2016). Routinized killing of animals: Going beyond dirty work and prestige to understand the well-being of slaughterhouse workers. Organization, 23(3), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508416629456
  15. Bastian, B., Costello, K., Loughnan, S., & Hodson, G. (2012). When Closing the HumanAnimal Divide Expands Moral Concern: The Importance of Framing. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(4), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611425106
  16. Batson, D. (2009). These Things Called Empathy: Eight Related but Distinct Phenomena. In J. Cacioppo & G. Bernston (Eds.), The Social Neuroscience of Empathy (pp. 3–15). The MIT Press
  17. Beirne, P. (1995). The Use and Abuse of Animals in Criminology: A Brief History and Current Review. Social Justice, 22(1), 5–31.
  18. Beirne, P. (2004). From animal abuse to interhuman violence? A critical review of the progression thesis. Society and Animals, 12(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853004323029531
  19. Bell, L. (2001). Abusing Children - Abusing Animals. Journal of Social Work, 1(2), 223– 234. https://doi.org/10.1177/146801730100100207
  20. Berenguer, J. (2007). The Effect of Empathy in Proenvironmental Attitudes and Behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 39(2), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506292937
  21. Broadway, M. J. (2000). Planning for Change in Small Towns or Trying to Avoid the Slaughterhouse Blues. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00038-8
  22. Bronner, S. J. (2004). “This Is Why We Hunt”: Social-Psychological Meanings of the Traditions and Rituals of Deer Camp. Western Folklore, 63(1), 11–50.
  23. Connell, R. W. (2003). Masculinidades. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coordinación de Humanidades, Programa Universitario de Estudios de Género.
  24. Costello, K., & Hodson, G. (2010). Exploring the roots of dehumanization: The role of animal-human similarity in promoting immigrant humanization. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209347725
  25. Costello, K., & Hodson, G. (2014). Explaining dehumanization among children: The interspecies model of prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12016
  26. Coston, C. T. M., & Protz, B. M. (1998). Kill your dog, beat your wife, screw your neighbor’s kids, rob a bank?: a cursory look at an individual’s vat of social chaos resulting from deviance. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 26(2), 153–158.
  27. Crespo Carrillo, C. A. (2017). Algunos aspectos psicológicos para explicar el desarrollo de la afición taurina. Anamnesis. Revista de Bioética, 12, 19–28.
  28. Dadds, M. R., Turner, C. M., & McAloon, J. (2002). Developmental Links between Cruelty to Animals and Human Violence. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 35(3), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1375/000486502320814377
  29. de Backer, C., Erreygers, S., de Cort, C., Vandermoere, F., Dhoest, A., Vrinten, J., & van Bauwel, S. (2020). Meat and masculinities. Can differences in masculinity predict meat consumption, intentions to reduce meat and attitudes towards vegetarians? Appetite, 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104559
  30. DeViney, E., Dickert, J., & Lockwood, R. (1983). The Care of Pets Within Child Abusing Families. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems, 4(4), 321–329. http://search.proquest.com/docview/616882281?accountid=11233%5Cnhttp://sfx.scholarsportal.info/guelph?genre=article&sid=ProQ:&atitle=Thecareofpetswithinchildabusingfamilies.&title=InternationalJournalfo theStudofAnimalProblems&issn=0195-755
  31. Dhont, K., & Hodson, G. (2014). Why do right-wing adherents engage in more animal exploitation and meat consumption? Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.002
  32. Dhont, K., Hodson, G., Costello, K., & MacInnis, C. C. (2014). Social dominance orientation connects prejudicial human-human and human-animal relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 61–62, 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.020
  33. Dhont, K., Hodson, G., & Leite, A. C. (2016). Common Ideological Roots of Speciesism and Generalized Ethnic Prejudice: The Social Dominance Human–Animal Relations Model (SD-HARM). European Journal of Personality, 30(6), 507–522 https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2069
  34. Dhont, K., Hodson, G., Loughnan, S., & Amiot, C. E. (2019). Rethinking humananimal relations: The critical role of social psychology. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 22(6), 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219864455
  35. Dillard, J. (2007). A Slaughterhouse Nightmare: Psychological Harm Suffered by Slaughterhouse Employees and the Possibility of Redress through Legal Reform. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy, 1–18. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1016401
  36. Eisnitz, G. A. (2007). Slaughterhouse: the shocking story of greed, neglect, and inhumane treatment inside the U.S. meat industry. Prometheus Books.
  37. Emhan, A., Yildiz, A. Ş., Bez, Y., & Kingir, S. (2009). Psychological Symptom Profile of Butchers Working in Slaughterhouse and Retail Meat Packing Business: A Comparative Study. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi, 18(2), 319–322. https://doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2011.5494
  38. Epley, N., Waytz, A., Akalis, S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition, 26(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143
  39. Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
  40. Everett, J. A. C., Caviola, L., Savulescu, J., & Faber, N. S. (2019). Speciesism, generalized prejudice, and perceptions of prejudiced others. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 22(6), 785–803. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218816962
  41. Felthous, A. R. (1981). Childhood Cruelty to Cats, Dogs and Other Animals. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 9(1), 48–53.
  42. Felthous, A. R., & Kellert, S. R. (1987). Childhood cruelty to animals and later aggression against people: A review. American Journal of Psychiatry, 38(12), 1113–1129. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.144.6.710
  43. Filippi, M., Riccitelli, G., Falini, A., Salle, F. di, Vuilleumier, P., Comi, G., & Rocca, M. A. (2010). The brain functional networks associated to human and animal suffering differ among omnivores, vegetarians and vegans. PLoS ONE, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010847
  44. Fitzgerald, A. J., Kalof, L., & Dietz, T. (2009). Slaughterhouses and increased crime rates: An empirical analysis of the spillover from “The Jungle” into the surrounding community. Organization and Environment, 22(2), 158–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026609338164
  45. Flynn, C. P. (2000). Battered Women and Their Animal Companions: Symbolic Interaction Between Human and Nonhuman Animals. Society and Animals, 8(2), 99– 127. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853000511032
  46. Fogle, B., & Abrahamson, D. (1990). Pet Loss: A Survey of the Attitudes and Feelings of Practicing Veterinarians. Anthrozoös, 3(3), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279390787057568
  47. Foster, G. (1975). Cockfighting: The Social Structure of a Deviant Subculture. (Master Thesis). Western Kentucky University.
  48. Frommer, S. S., & Arluke, A. (1999). Loving Them to Death: Blame-Displacing Strategies of Animal Shelter Workers and Surrenderers. Society and Animals, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853099X00121
  49. Gaard, G. (2002). Vegetarian Ecofeminism: A Review Essay. A Journal of Women Studies, 23(3), 117–146. https://doi.org/10.1353/fro.2003.0006
  50. Geertz, C. (1972). Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight: The MIT Press, 101(1), 1–37
  51. Goff, P. A., Eberhardt, J. L., Williams, M. J., & Jackson, M. C. (2008). Not Yet Human: Implicit Knowledge, Historical Dehumanization, and Contemporary Consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.292
  52. Greenebaum, J., & Dexter, B. (2018). Vegan men and hybrid masculinity. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(6), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1287064
  53. Hall, J. A., & Schwartz, R. (2019). Empathy present and future. Journal of Social Psychology, 159(3), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1477442
  54. Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An Integrative Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003
  55. Haslam, N., Kashima, Y., Loughnan, S., Shi, J., & Suitner, C. (2008). Subhuman, inhuman, and superhuman: Contrasting humans with nonhumans in three cultures. Social Cognition, 26(2), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.248
  56. Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevpsych-010213-115045
  57. Hawley, F. (1993). The Moral and Conceptual Universe of Cockfighters: Symbolism and Rationalization. Society and Animals, 1(2), 159–168.
  58. Herzog, H. (2002). Ethical Aspects of Relationships Between Humans and Research Animals. ILAR Journal, 43(1), 27–32. https://academic.oup.com/ilarjournal/article/43/1/27/845912
  59. Herzog, H. A. (2007). Gender Differences in Human-Animal Interactions: A review. Anthrozoös, 20(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279307780216687
  60. Hill, A. M. (1993). The Motivational Bases of Attitudes Toward Animals. Society and Animals, 1(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/156853093X00028
  61. Hodson, G., & Costello, K. (2007). Interpersonal Disgust, Ideological Orientations, and Dehumanization as Predictors of Intergroup Attitudes. Psychological Science, 18(8), 691–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01962.x
  62. Hyers, L. L. (2006). Myths used to legitimize the exploitation of animals: An application of Social Dominance Theory. Anthrozoos, 19(3), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279306785415538
  63. Jones, D. N., & Neria, A. L. (2015). The Dark Triad and dispositional aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 360–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.021
  64. Jones, P. (2010). Roosters, hawks and dawgs: Toward an inclusive, embodied eco/feminist psychology. Feminism and Psychology, 20(3), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353510368120
  65. Joy, M. (2002). Psychic Numbing and Meat Consumption: The Psychology of Carnism. Saybrook University
  66. Kalof, L., & Fitzgerald, A. (2003). Reading the trophy: Exploring the display of dead animals in hunting magazines. Visual Studies, 18(2), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860310001631985
  67. Kalof, L., Fitzgerald, A., & Baralt, L. (2004). Animals, Women, and Weapons: Blurred Sexual Boundaries in the Discourse of Sport Hunting. Society and Animals, 12(3), 237– 251. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568530042880695
  68. Kavanagh, P. S., Signal, T. D., & Taylor, N. (2013). The Dark Triad and animal cruelty: Dark personalities, dark attitudes, and dark behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(6), 666–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.05.019
  69. Kellert, S. R., & Felthous, A. R. (1985). Childhood Cruelty toward Animals among Criminals and Noncriminals. Human Relations, 38(12), 1113–1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678503801202
  70. Kwan, V. S. Y., & Fiske, S. T. (2008). Missing links in social cognition: The continuum from nonhuman agents to dehumanized humans. Social Cognition, 26(2), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.125
  71. Lee, S. A., & Quarles, L. (2012). Who Feels Sympathy for Roosters Used in Cockfighting? Examining the Influence of Feelings, Belief in Animal Mind, Personality, and EmpathyRelated Traits. Society and Animals, 20(4), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341263
  72. Leibler, J. H., Janulewicz, P. A., & Perry, M. J. (2017). Prevalence of serious psychological distress among slaughterhouse workers at a United States beef packing plant. Work, 57(1), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-172543
  73. Loughnan, S., Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2014). The Psychology of Eating Animals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414525781
  74. Luke, B. (1998). Violent Love: Hunting, Heterosexuality, and the Erotics of Men’s Predation. Feminist Studies, 24(3), 627–655.
  75. MacNair, R. M. (2002). Perpetration-induced traumatic stress: The psychological consequences of killing. Greenwood publishing.
  76. Marvin, G. (1984). The Cockfight in Andalusia, Spain: Images of the Truly Male. Anthropological Quarterly, 57(2), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/3317580
  77. Merz-Perez, L., Heide, K. M., & Silverman, I. J. (2001). Childhood Cruelty to Animals and Subsequent Violence against Humans. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45(5), 556–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X01455003
  78. Owens, C. E., Davis, R., & Smith, B. H. (1981). The Psychology of Euthanizing Animals: The Emotional Components. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems, 2(1981), 19–26. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?f=2012/OV/OV20120100670010067.xml;US19820759430
  79. Paniagua, C. (2008). Psicología de la afición taurina. Ars Médica. Revista de Humanidades, 2, 140–157.
  80. Paul, E. S. (2000). Empathy with Animals and with Humans: Are they linked? Anthrozoös, 13(4), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279300786999699
  81. Perry, A., Bentin, S., Bartal, I. B. A., Lamm, C., & Decety, J. (2010). “Feeling” the pain of those who are different from us: Modulation of EEG in the mu/alpha range. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 10(4), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.10.4.493
  82. Piazza, J., Ruby, M. B., Loughnan, S., Luong, M., Kulik, J., Watkins, H. M., & Seigerman, M. (2015). Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns. Appetite, 91, 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.011
  83. Pink, S. (2003). “She wasn’t Tall Enough and Breasts Get in the Way”: Why Would a Woman Bullfighter Retire? Identities, 10(4), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/714947400
  84. Plous, S. (2003). Is there such a thing as prejudice toward animals? In S. Plous (ed.). Understanding Prejudice and Discrimination (pp. 509-528). McGraw Hill.
  85. Porcher, J., & Cousson-Gélie, F. (2004). Affective Components of the Human-Animal Relationship in Animal Husbandry: Development and Validation of a Questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 95(5), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.95.1.275-290
  86. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 271–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772
  87. Reeve, C. L., Spitzmüller, C., Rogelberg, S. G., Walker, A., Schultz, L., & Clark, O. (2004). Employee Reactions and Adjustment to Euthanasia-Related Work: Identifying Turning-Point Events Through Retrospective Narratives. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 7(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0701_1
  88. Rohlf, V., & Bennett, P. (2005). Perpetration-induced traumatic stress in persons Who euthanize nonhuman animals in surgeries, animal shelters, and laboratories. Society and Animals, 13(3), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568530054927753
  89. Rollin, B. E. (1987). Euthanasia and Moral Stress. Loss, Grief & Care, 1(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315826202
  90. Rothgerber, H. (2013). Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche: Masculinity and the justification of meat consumption. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 14(4), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030379
  91. Ruby, M. B., & Heine, S. J. (2011). Meat, morals, and masculinity. Appetite, 56(2), 447–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.018
  92. Sanders, C. R. (1995). Killing with Kindness: Veterinary Euthanasia and the Social Construction of Personhood. Sociological Forum, 10(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02095958
  93. Schultz, P. W. (2000). Empathizing With Nature: The Effects of Perspective Taking on Concern for Environmental Education. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 391-406. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 391–406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00174
  94. Sevillano, V., Aragonés, J. I., & Schultz, W. P. (2007). Perspective Taking, Environmental Concern, and the Moderating Role of Dispositional Empathy. Environment and Behavior, 39(5), 685–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506292334
  95. Sidanius, J., Cotterill, S., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Kteily, N., & Carvacho, H. (2016). Social Dominance Theory: Explorations in the Psychology of Oppression. In C. G. Sibley & F. K. Barlow (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice (pp. 149– 187). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316161579.008
  96. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social Dominance: An Intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175043
  97. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2002). An Integrated Threat Theory of Prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–46). Erlbaum.
  98. Tallichet, S. E., & Hensley, C. (2004). Exploring the link between recurrent acts of childhood and adolescent animal cruelty and subsequent violent crime. Criminal Justice Review, 29(2), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/073401680402900203
  99. Taylor, N., & Signal, T. D. (2005). Empathy and attitudes to animals. Anthrozoös, 18(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279305785594342
  100. Waytz, A., Morewedge, C. K., Epley, N., Monteleone, G., Gao, J. H., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Making sense by making sentient: effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 410–435. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020240
  101. York, R. (2004). Humanity and inhumanity: Toward a Sociology of the Slaughterhouse. Organization & Environment, 17(2), 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026604264878
  102. Young, K. M. (2017). Masculine Compensation and Masculine Balance: Notes on the Hawaiian Cockfight. Social Forces, 95(4), 1341–1370. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox022
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |