Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Effect of provenance and storage on coffee quality

Efecto de la procedencia y el almacenamiento en en la calidad del café




Section
Artículo Original Producto de Investigación

How to Cite
Muñoz, J. C., Riaño Campo, E., & Pinzón, A. J. (2019). Effect of provenance and storage on coffee quality. NOVA, 17(31), 117-128. https://revistas.unicolmayor.edu.co/index.php/nova/article/view/949

DOI
license

Licencia Creative Commons

NOVA by http://www.unicolmayor.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/nova is distributed under a license creative commons non comertial-atribution-withoutderive 4.0 international.

Furthermore, the authors keep their property intellectual rights over the articles.

 

Juan Carlos Muñoz
    Elías Riaño Campo
      Alba Janeth Pinzón

        Background. The quality of the coffee bean has been related to its origin, the agronomic management and the storage conditions. Objective. To determine the activity of the polyphenyl oxidase, the lipid content, the color and the organoleptic characteristics of coffees from 3 experimental substations. Materials and methods. A completely randomized design was followed in a 3x6 factorial arrangement (places of coffee origin and storage time respectively). Results. The activity of polyphenyl oxidase is greater in fresh coffee-for the three provenances. The coffee from Naranjal presented higher enzymatic activities than the coffees from the Supía and the Catalina substations. The analysis of variance showed the effect of provenance on the enzyme activity variable. The activity of the polyphenyl oxidase in the coffees studied decreases with storage time. The lipid content is lower at a lower height in the Catalina. All coffees were characterized as good quality at zero storage time; but the characteristics of aroma, intensity of aroma and body presented ups and downs in the different months of storage. Naranjal coffee,  on average, obtained an acceptable rating throughout the six months of storage. Conclusions. Significant differences were found for the variables studied due to the effect of provenance and storage. The enzymatic activity of the PFO showed activation / inhibition stages, during the six months of storage.


        Article visits 249 | PDF visits 188


        Downloads

        Download data is not yet available.

        1. CCI. Centro de Comercio Internacional.Calidad del café: guía del exportador, UNCTAD/OMC, Ginebra. 2002: 270-321.
        2. Aguiar LC, Fazuoli TJ, Salva G, Favarin JL. Che- mical diversity in coffee plants of Coffea canephora. Bragantia. 2005; 64: 577-582.
        3. Fridell G. Coffee. John Wiley & Sons. 2014.
        4. Silva E, Mazzafera P, Brunini O, Sakai E, Arruda F, Mattoso L, Carvalho C, Pires, R. The influence of water management and environmental conditions on the chemical composition and beverage quality of coffee beans. Brazilian journal of plant physiology.2005; 17(2): 229-238.
        5. Costa da Silva M, Castro H, Farnezi M, Pinto N, Andrade V, Silva E. Caracterização química e senso- rial de cafés da chapada de minas, visando determi- nar a qualidade final do café de alguns municípios produtores. Ciência e Agrotecnologia. 2009; 33: 1782-1787. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413- 70542009000700014.
        6. Neves BJ, Borem FM, Cirillo MA, Ribeiro MM, Al- ves AA, Ramos AH. Coffee quality and its interac- tions with environmental factors in Minas Gerais, Brazilian J. Agric. Sci. 2012; 4: 181-190.
        7. Suárez SJC, Rodríguez BE, Duran BE. Efecto de las condiciones de cultivo, las características químicas del suelo y el manejo de grano en los atributos sensoriales de café (Coffea arabica L.) en taza. Acta Agronomica. 2015; 64: 342-348.
        8. Alonso-Salces RM, Serra F, Reniero F, Héberger K. Botanical and geographical characterization of green coffee (Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora): che- mometric evaluation of phenolic and methylxanthine contents. J. Agric Food Chem. 2009: 57(10):4224- 35. doi: 10.1021/jf8037117. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
        9. Scholz, M, Da Silva J, Garcia V, de Figuereido C, Kitzberger S. Sensory attributes and phisycalchemi- cal characteristics of the coffee beverage from IAPAR cultivar. Coffee Science. 2013; 8: 6-16.
        10. Cruz R, Morais S, Casal S. Mineral composition va- riability of coffees: A result of processing and pro- duction. In: Preddy V. (ed). Processing and Impact on Active Components in Food. Elsevier,The Nether- lands.2015: 549-558.
        11. Quideau S, Deffieux D, Douat-Casassus C, Pouységu L. Plant polyphenols: chemical properties, biological activities, and synthesis. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011; 50(3):586-621. doi: 10.1002/anie.201000044. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
        12. Farah A, Monteiro M, Calado V, Franca AS, Trugo L.C. Correlation between cup quality and chemical
        attributes of Brazilian coffee. Food Chem. 2006; 98: 373-380.
        13. Speer K, Kölling-Speer I. The lipid fraction of the coffee bean. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2006; 8 (1): 201- 216.
        14. Pohl P, Stelmach E, Welma M, Szymezycha-Madeja
        A. Determination of the elemental composition of coffee using instrumental methods. Food Anal. Me- thods. 2013; 6: 598-613.
        15. Bertrand B, Villarreal D, Laffargue A, Posada H, Las- hermes P, Dussert S. Comparison of the effectiveness of fatty Acids, chlorogenic Acids, and elements for the chemometric discrimination of coffee (Coffea arabicaL.) varieties and growing origins. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 2008; 56(6):2273- 2280.
        16. Hecimovic I, Belscak-Cvitanovic A, Horzic D, Ko- mes D. Comparative study of polyphenols and caffei- ne in different coffee varieties affected by the degree of roasting. Food chemistry. 2011; 129: 991-1000.
        17. Upadhyay R, Mohan-Rao LJ. An outlook on chloro- genic acids—occurrence, chemistry, technology, and biological activities. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2013; 53(9): 968-984.
        18. Cho AR, Park KW, Kim KM, Kim SY, Han J. In- fluence of roasting conditions on the antioxidant characteristics of Colombian Coffee (Coffee arabica) beans. Journal of Food Biochemnistry. (2013); 38(3). Doi:10.1111/jfbc.12045.
        19. Uman E. et al. The effect of bean origin and tempe- rature on grinding roasted coffee. Sci. Rep. 2016; 6: 24483. doi: 10.1038/srep24483.
        20. Wintgens J.N. Coffee: Growing, processing, sustaina- ble production. A guidebook for growers, processors, traders and researchers. (2nded.), Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany (2012).
        21. Gutiérrez H, De La Vara R. Análisis y diseño de ex- perimentos. México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana; 2008.
        22. CIE. (2016). Colorimetry, 3RD edition. Disponible en Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage: http:// www.cie.co.at, Acceso en: 22 de marzo de 2016.
        23. Luo M, Cui G, Rigg B. The development of the CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000. Color Research & Aplication. 2001; 26(5): 340–350.
        24. Mac Dougall D. Colour measurement of food: prin- ciples and practice: p. 3.1-3.12. En: D.B. MacDou- gall (Ed.). Colour in food. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL; 2002.
        25. Westland, S. Color. En: Paravina R, Powers JM. Es- thetic color training in dentistry. Elsevier Mosby; 2004.
        26. Gómez-Polo C, Portillo M, Lorenzo M, Vicente P, Galindo P, Martín A. Comparison of the CIELab and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas. The journal of prosthetic dentistry.2016; 115(1):65-70.
        27. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed, 2007 (on line) AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
        28. NTC. Normas técnicas colombianas. (2000). Bogotá, Colombia.
        29. Puerta, G. Escala para la evaluación de la calidad de la bebida de café verde Coffea arabica, procesado por vía húmeda. Cenicafe. 1996; 47(4): 231- 234.
        30. Borem F, Ribeiro F, Figueiredo L, Giomo G, Fortuna- to V, Izquierdo P. Evaluation of the sensory and color quality of coffee beans stored in hermetic packaging. Journal store products Research. 2013; 52:1– 6.
        31. Fridell G. Coffee. John Wiley & Sons. 2014.
        32. Speer K, Kölling-Speer I. The lipid fraction of the coffee bean. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2006; 18(1):201- 216.
        33. Kreuml M, Majchrzak D, Ploederl B, Koenig J. Changes in sensory quality characteristics of coffee during storage. Food Science Nutrition. 2013; 1(4): 267– 272.
        34. Queiroz C, Lopes M, Fialho E, Valente-Mesqui- ta V. Polyphenol oxidase: characteristics and me-chanisms of browning control. Food Reviews In- ternational. 2008; 24(4): 361-375. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/87559120802089332.
        35. Nebesny E, Budryn G. Evaluation of sensory attribu- tes of coffee brews from robusta coffee roasted under different conditions. European Food Research and Technology. 2006; 224:159–165.
        36. Rendón M, Garcia T, Bragagnolo N. Impact of che- mical changes on the sensory characteristics of co- ffee beans during storage. Food Chemistry. 2014; 147: 279-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.food- chem.2013.09.123.
        37. Selmar D, Bytof G, Knopp E. The storage of green coffee (Coffea arabica): Decrease of viability and changes of potential aroma precursors. Ann Bot. 2008; 101(1): 31–38.
        38. Sunarharum W, Yuwono S, Pangestu W. & Nadhi- roh H. Physical and sensory quality of Java Arabica green coffee beans. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and En- vironmental Science. 2018;131. doi:10.1088/1755- 1315/131/1/012018.

        Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |