Hacia una ética transdisciplinaria de los estudios globales.

Shu mei Shih

doi:10.25058/20112742.n38.02

Para uma ética transdisciplinar dos estudos globais.

Publicado 2021-07-21

Abrir | Descarga

PDF (Espanhol) FLIP application/xml XML (Espanhol)

Edição

N.º 38 (2021): Abril - Junio

Secção

Artículos

Como Citar

Shih, S. mei. (2021). Para uma ética transdisciplinar dos estudos globais. Tabula Rasa, 38, 25-48. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n38.02

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n38.02

Dimensions

PlumX

Shu mei Shih

University of California

Mostrar biografia dos autores

Shu mei Shih,

Ph.D., University of California, Los Angeles, 1992, es la primera profesora de la cátedra Edward W. Said de Literatura Comparada

Estudos globais

Ocidente e o demais

Províncialização de Ocidente

Desfetichizar o demais

História universal integradora

Histórias conectadas

Teoria dos sistemas mundo

Quaternário sagrado do poder discursivo

Esse artigo almeja agir nos limites disciplinares que têm obstruído, até agora, o intercâmbio significativo de ideias entre diferentes formações intelectuais nos estudos de “literatura universal”, “história mundial”, “arte universal”, “musica mundial”, “cine mundial” e assim por diante, num conglomerado sob o nome de “estudos globais”. Num momento em que a interconexão global se torna mais e mais decisiva, além de profunda, em nossa época contemporânea. Isso não apenas pela globalização cultural e econômica, mas pela exacerbação da crise ecológica, o estudo do mundo tal e qual — sem importar como se defina desde diferentes pontos de vista ontológicos e epistemológicos — precisa um esforço transdisciplinar concertado. Ao considerar a literatura e a história universais como exemplos, esse artigo faz um esforço transdisciplinar e, ao mesmo tempo, adverte contra a construção de centrismos alternativos em nossa necessária desconstrução do eurocentrismo em nossos estudos do mundo.

Visualizações de artigos 114 | Visitas em PDF 107

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Abu-Lughod, J. L. (1991). Before European Hegemony: The World System A.D. 1250-1350.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aidi, H. D. (2005). Let Us Be Moors: Islam, Race, y “Connected Histories”. Souls: A Critical Journal of Black Politics, Culture, and Society, 7(1), 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999940590910032
Aldridge, A. O. & Kamei, S. (1972). ‘A Note.’ Problems and Vistas of Comparative Literature in Japan and the United States: A Dialogue. Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, 5(4), 149-163. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i24775427
Bassnett, S. (1993). Comparative Literature: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Bose, S. (2006). A Hundred Horizons: The Indian Ocean in the Age of Global Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chang, S. Y. (2016). Wartime Taiwan: Epitome of an East Asian Modality of the Modern Literary Institution? En C. Rojas & A. Bachner. The Oxford Handbook of Modern Chinese Literatures (pp.417-439). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chakravarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chatterjee, P. (1986). Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse. New York: Zed Books.
Chaudhuri, K. N. (1985). Trade and Civilization in the Indian Ocean: An Economic History from the Rise of Islam to 1750. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eskildsen, R. (2002). Of Civilization and Savages: The Mimetic Imperialism of Japan’s 1874 Expedition to Taiwan. American Historical Review, 107(2), 388-418. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/107.2.388
Fairbank, J. K. (1966). China’s World Order: The Tradition of Chinese Foreign Relations. Encounter, 27(6), 14-20.
Fletcher, J. F. (1995). Studies on Chinese and Islamic Inner Asia, Manz, B.F. (Ed.). Aldershot, Hampshire: Variorum.
Frank, A. G. (1998). Re-Orient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Frank, A. G. & Gills, B. K. (1994). The World System: Five Hundred Years or Five Thousand? New York: Routledge.
Frank, J. (1991). The Idea of Spatial Form. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Glissant, E. (1997). Poetics of Relation (Trad. Betsy Wing). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://www.press.umich.edu/10262/poetics_of_relation
Hamashita, T. (2008). China, East Asia, and the Global Economy: Regional and Historical Perspectives. L. Grove & M. Seldon (eds.). Nueva York: Routledge.
Harootunian, H. & Miyoshi, M. (Eds.). (2002). Leaning Places: The Afterlives of Area Studies. Durham: Duke University Press.
Hobson, J. M. (2004). The Eastern Origin of Western Civilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kleeman, F. Y. (2003). Under an Imperial Sun: Japanese Colonial Literature of Taiwan and the South. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Levanthes, L. (1991). When China Ruled the Seas: The Treasure Fleet of the Dragon Throne, 1405-1433. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pearson, M. (2013). The Indian Ocean. New York: Routledge.
Pomoranz, K. (2001). The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of Modern World History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Posnett, H. M. (1886). Comparative Literature. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Rama, A. (1996). The Lettered City. (trad. John Charles Chasteen). Durham: Duke University Press.
Schiller, F. (1972 [1789]. The Nature and Value of Universal History: An Inaugural Lecture. History and Theory, 11(3) 321-334. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2504683?seq=1
Shih, S. (2019). Racializing Area Studies, Defetishizing China. Positions, 27(1), 33-65. https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-7251806
Shih, S. (2013). Comparison as Relation. In R. Felski, & S. Friedman (Eds.). Comparison: Theories, Approaches, Uses, (pp.79-98). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Shih, S. (2004). Global Literature and the Politics of Recognition. PMLA, 119(1), 16-30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1261482?seq=1
Shih, S. (2001). The Lure of the Modern: Writing Modernism in Semicolonial China, 1917-1937. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Spivak, G. (2005). The Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press.
Stoler, A. (1995). Race and the Education of Desire: Foucault’s History of Sexuality and the Colonial Order of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
Subrahmanyam, S. (2007). Holding the World in Balance: The Connected Histories of the Iberian Overseas Empires, 1500-1640. The American H istorical Review, 112(5), 1359-1385. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr.112.5.1359
Subrahmanyam, S. (2005). Explorations in Connected History: from the Tagus to the Ganges,
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Subrahmanyam, S. (1999). Connected Histories: Notes Towards a Reconfiguration of Early Modern Eurasia. In V. Lieberman (ed.). Beyond Binary Histories: Reimagining Eurasia to c. 1830. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Zhao, T. (2006). Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept ‘All-under-Heaven’ (Tian-xia, 天下), Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture, 12(1), 29-41. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504630600555559#:~:text=Original%20Articles-Rethinking%20Empire%20from%20a%20Chinese%20Concept%20’All%2Dunder%2DHeaven,’%20(Tian%2Dxia%2C%20)&text=In%20this%20paper%20the%20author,hearts%20and%20a%20world%20institution
Zhao, T. (2005). The Tianxia System: An Introduction to the Philosophy of World Institution (tianxia tixi). Nanjing: Jiangsu jiaoyu chubanshe.