Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Claiming a kinship between postcolonial and decolonial feminisms via Spivak and Rivera Cusicanqui.

Reivindicar la cercanía entre los feminismos poscoloniales y decoloniales con base en Spivak y Rivera Cusicanqui.



How to Cite
Claiming a kinship between postcolonial and decolonial feminisms via Spivak and Rivera Cusicanqui. (2019). Tabula Rasa, 30, 13-25. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n30.01

Dimensions
PlumX
Kiran Asher Author

Kiran Asher,

Ph.D. Profesora del Departamento de Estudios sobre Mujeres, Género y Sexualidad.


In the last few years, postcolonial and decolonial feminisms have been pitched against each other. In this commentary I make a case for treating them as kin. I do so by juxtaposing some of the ideas found in the writing of Gayatri Spivak and Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui. Neither claims to be a postcolonial or decolonial feminist, though their writings are regularly cited in reference to these fields. Both grapple with the thorny matter of representing subalternity and indigeneity, not only in Eurocentric scholarship, but also by migrant and diasporic academics and national elites. I contend that it is their persistent critiques of representation that can help foster a dialogue between postcolonial and decolonial feminist scholarship. Such dialogues entail reaching across linguistic, historical, geographical, political, and theoretical boundaries to establish anti-colonial alliances.


Article visits 210 | PDF visits 96


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Álvarez, S. E., Lima Costa, C. de., Feliu, F., Hester, R., Klahn, N. & ftayer, M. con C. C. Bueno. (2014). Introduction. En Translocalities/Translocalidades: Feminist Politics of Translation in the Latin/a Américas, (pp. 1-28). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  2. Asher, K. (2016). Negro y verde: etnicidad, economía y ecología en los movimientos negros del pacífico colombiano. Serie Terrenos etnográficos. Bogotá: Icesi e Icanh.
  3. Asher, K. (2011). Latin American Decolonial ftought, or Making the Subaltern Speak. Geography Compass, 7, 832-842.
  4. Asher, K. & Wainwright, J. (2019). After Post-Development: On Capitalism, Difference, and Representation. Antipode, 51(1), 25-44.
  5. Cornell, D. (2012). fte Ethical Affirmation of Human Rights: Gayatri Spivak’s Intervention. En Can the Subaltern Speak? Reflections on the History of an Idea, (pp. 100- 114). NY: Columbia University Press.
  6. Escobar, A. (2010). Una minga para el posdesarrollo. Lima: Programa Democracia y Transformación Global.
  7. Escobar, A. (1996). La invención del desarrollo. Popayán: Universidad del Cauca. Lugones, M. (2008). Colonialidad y género. Tabula Rasa, 9, 73-101.
  8. Maese-Cohen, M. (2010). Introduction: Toward Planetary Decolonial Feminisms. Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences, 18, 3-27.
  9. Millán Moncayo M. (2011) Feminismos, postcolonialidad, decolonización: ¿del centro a los márgenes? Andamios, 8, 11-36.
  10. Mohanty, C. T. (1991). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourse. En C. Mohanty, A. Russo y L. Torres (Eds.), Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism (pp. 51-80). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  11. Morris, R. (2012). Introduction. En Can the Subaltern Speak? Reflections on the History of an Idea (pp. 1-18). NY: Columbia University Press.
  12. Prada, A. R. (2014). Is Anzaldúa Translatable in Bolivia? En S. E. Alvarez, C. de Lima Costa, V. Feliu, R. Hester, N. Klahn & M. ftayer (Eds.), Translocalities/Translocalidades:
  13. Feminist Politics of Translation in the Latin/a Américas, (pp. 57-77). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  14. Quijano, A. (2000). Colonialidad del poder y clasificación social. Journal of World-Systems Research, vi (2), 342-386. Edición especial: Festchrift for Immanuel Wallerstein.
  15. Quijano, A. (1992). Colonialidad y modernidad/racionalidad. Perú Indígena 13(29), 11- 20.
  16. Rivera Cusicanqui, S. (2010). Ch’ixinakax utxiwa: una reflexión sobre prácticas y discursos descolonizadores. Buenos Aires: Tinta Limón.
  17. Rivera Cusicanqui, S. (1997). La noción de «derecho» o las paradojas de la modernidad postcolonial: indígenas y mujeres en Bolivia, Temas Sociales: Revista de Sociología UMSA, 19, 27-52.
  18. Rivera Cusicanqui, S. (1984). «Oprimidos pero no vencidos». Luchas del campesinado aymara y qhichwa, 1900-1980. La Paz: La Mirada Salvaje.
  19. Rivera Cusicanqui, S. & Barragán, R. (comps.), (1997). Debates pos-coloniales: una introducción a los estudios de la subalternidad. La Paz: SEPHIS, Editorial historias y Ediciones Aruwiry.
  20. Shiva, V. (1988). Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and Survival. Londres: Zed Books.
  21. Spivak, G. C. (2012). An Aesthetic Education in the Era of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  22. Spivak, G. C. (2004). Righting Wrongs–2002: Accessing Democracy Among the Aborigines, En Other Asias, (pp. 14-57). Oxford: Blackwell.
  23. Spivak, G. C. (1999). A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  24. Spivak, G. C. (1995). Imaginary Maps: Three Stories by Mahasweta Devi. NY: Routledge. Spivak, G. C. (1994). Responsibility. boundary 2, 21(3)19-64.
  25. Spivak, G. C. (1990). The Post-Colonial Critic: Interviews, Strategies, Dialogues (ed. Sarah Harasym). NY: Routledge.
  26. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? En C. Nelson y L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, (pp. 271-313). Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |