Intercambio, cuidado y ser humano: chamanismo y el ritual haaihí jëeu nʌm entre los wounaan de Panamá

Exchange, caretaking, and being human: Shamanism and the haaihí jëeu nʌm ritual among Wounaan in Panamá

Publicado 2020-11-04

Abrir | Descargar
PDF FLIP XML
Número
Núm. 36 (2020): Octubre - Diciembre
Sección
Artículos
Cómo citar
Velásques Runk, J. (2020). Intercambio, cuidado y ser humano: chamanismo y el ritual haaihí jëeu nʌm entre los wounaan de Panamá. Tabula Rasa, 36, 151-176. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n36.06
DOI

https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n36.06
Dimensions
PlumX
Julia Velásques Runk
University of Georgia & Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute , USA
    Mostrar biografía de los autores

    Julia Velásques Runk,

    Ph.D. Yale University.

    Professor, Department of Anthropology.

    Research Associate.

    El trabajo etnográfico sobre los wounaan, a menudo agrupados erróneamente con los embera, ha puesto énfasis en el chamanismo. Hoy los wounaan consideran el ritual de suplicar al creador, haaihí jëeu nʌm, como el más importante. Combinando los estudios indígenas con la literatura sobre ontología sostengo que los rituales chamánicos y haaihí jëeu nʌm operan como un requisito del intercambio moral requerido entre los reinos de realidad humanos y no humanos. Basada en más de veinte años de investigación socioambiental con la aprobación de las autoridades y comunidades wounaan, utilizo las tradiciones orales y la observación participante. Muestro cómo los rituales son parte de intercambios que permiten cuidar el bienestar de los wounaan, otros seres y su entorno. El cuidado encarnado y experto es fundamental para los rituales y hace énfasis en nutrir a los antepasados, las personas, los espíritus y otros seres no humanos. Concluyo con un llamado a los wounaan para que exploren la complejidad sociolingüística de sus tradiciones orales y rituales con el fin de corregir las simplificaciones ontológicas.

    Visitas del artículo 135 | Visitas PDF 85

    Descargas

    Los datos de descarga todavía no están disponibles.
    1. Arenas Gómez, J. (2020). Parents who own lives: relations and persons among the I’ku, a Chibchan group in Colombia. En E. Halbmayer (Ed.). Amerindian socio-cosmologies between the Andes, Amazonía and Mesoamerica: Towards an Anthropological Understanding of la región istmo-colombiana, (pp.181-204). London: Routledge.
    2. Bell, N. (2013). Anishinaabe Bimaadiziwin: Living spiritually with respect, relationship, reciprocity, and responsibility. En A. Kulnieks, D. Rorohiakewen Longboat, & K. Young (Eds.). Contemporary studies in ambiental and indigenous pedagogies, (pp.89-107). Boston: Sense Publishers.
    3. Bessire, L. & Bond, D. (2014). Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique. American Ethnologist, 41(3), 440-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12083
    4. Brightman, M., Fausto, C., & Grotti, V. (Eds.). (2016). Ownership and nurture: Studies in native Amazonian property relations. New York: Berghahn Books.
    5. Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Santa Fe: Clear Light Publishers.
    6. Castillero Calvo, A. (1994). Conquista, evangelización y resistencia. Panamá: Instituto Nacional de Cultura.
    7. Cole, P. (2002). Aboriginalizing methodology: Considering the canoe. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(4), 447-459. http://knowledgepublic.pbworks.com/f/Cole-AboriginalizingMethodology.pdf
    8. Constenla Umaña, A. (1991). Las lenguas del area intermedia: introducción a su estudio areal. San José: Editorial de la Universidad de Costa Rica.
    9. De Matos Viegas, S. (2016). Temporalities of ownership: Land posession and its transformations among Tupinambá (Bahia, Brazil). En M. Brightman, C. Fausto, & V. Grotti (Eds.). Ownership and nurture: Studies in native Amazonian property relations (pp.232-256). New York: Berghahn Books.
    10. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. (2005). sitio web DANE.
    11. Descola, P. (2012). Beyond nature and culture: Forms of attachment. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2(1), 447-471. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau2.1.020
    12. Dirección de Estadística y Censo. (2012). Censos nacionales de población y vivienda (tomo 3). Contraloría General de la República.
    13. Domicó, J. J., Hoyos, J. J., & Turbay, S. (2002). Janyama : un aprendiz de jaibaná. Medellín: Editorial Universidad de Antioquia.
    14. Douglas, M. (1990). No free gifts. En M. Mauss (Ed.), The gift: The form and reason for intercambio in archaic societies (pp.vii-xvii). New York: WW Norton.
    15. Fausto, C. & Rodgers, D. (1999). Of enemies and pets: warfare and shamanism in Amazonia. American Ethnologist, 26(4), 933-956. https://www.jstor.org/stable/647238
    16. Fausto, C. (2012). Too many owners: Mastery and ownership in Amazonía. En M. Brightman, V. E. Grotti, & O. Ulturgasheva (Eds.). Animism in rainforest and tundra: Personhood, animals, plants and things in contemporary Amazonia and Siberia, (pp.29-47). New York: Berghahn Books.
    17. Flórez, J. (2020). La guerra en el paraíso. Semana. https://especiales.semana.com/guerra-entre-el-eln-y-el-clan-del-golfo-en-choco-los-ninos-las-victimas/?fbclid=IwAR1c1yM9h3abE-Qxd2TGSC9y_KRvYctxQf7mk8SqthtUv7nW6czIMeI0kzI
    18. Geniusz, M. S. (2015). Plants have so much to give us, all we have to do is ask: Anishinaabe botanical teachings. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    19. Godelier, M. (1999). The enigma of the gift (N. Scott, trad.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    20. Goletz, A. (2020). Tuwancha, “the One Who Knows”: specialista and specialized knowledge in the transhuman communication among the Sokorpa Yukpa of the Serranía del Perijá, Colombia. In E. Halbmayer (Ed.). Amerindian socio-cosmologies between the Andes, Amazonia and Mesoamerica: Towards an anthropological understanding of Isthmo-Colombian region (pp.205-233). London: Routledge.
    21. Gordon, C. (2016). Ownership and well-being among the Mebengokre-Xikrin: Differentiation and ritual crises. En M. Brightman, C. Fausto, & V. Grotti (Eds.). Ownership and nurture: Studies in native Amazonian property relations (pp.209-231). New York: Berghahn Books.
    22. Gow, P. (1994). River people: chamanismo and history in Western Amazonia. En N. Thomas & C. Humphrey (Eds.). Shamanism, history and the State (pp.90-113). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    23. Halbmayer, E. (2012a). Amerindian mereology: Animism, analogy, and the multiverse. Indiana, 29, 103-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.18441/ind.v29i0.103-125
    24. Halbmayer, E. (2012b). Debating animism, perspectivism and the construction of ontologies. Special Journal Issue, Indiana, 29, 9-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.18441/ind.v29i0.9-23
    25. Halbmayer, E. (2019). Amerindian sociocosmologies of Northwestern South America. Some reflections on the dead, metamorphosis, and religious specialists. Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 24(1), 13-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlca.12381
    26. Halbmayer, E. (2020a). Amerindian socio-cosmologies between the Andes, Amazonía and Mesoamerica: Towards an anthropological understanding of Isthmo-Colombian region.London: Routledge.
    27. Halbmayer, E. (2020b). Introduction: Towards and anthropological understanding of the area between the Andes, Mesoamerica, and the Amazon. En E. Halbmayer (Ed.). Amerindian socio-cosmologies between the Andes, Amazonia and Mesoamerica: Towards an anthropological understanding of Isthmo-Colombian region, (pp.3-34). London: Routledge.
    28. Harris, L. D., & Wasilewski, J. (2004). Indigeneity, an alternative worldview: Four R’s (relationship, responsibility, reciprocity, redistribution) vs. two P’s (power and profit). Sharing the journey towards conscious evolution. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 21(5), 489-503. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.631
    29. Hernández Castillo, R. A., Hutchings, S., & Noble, B. (2019). Transcontinental dialogues: Activist alliances with indigneous peoples of Canada, Mexico, and Australia. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
    30. High, C. (2012). Shamans, animals and enemies: Human and non-human agency in an Amazonian cosmos of alterity. En M. Brightman, V. E. Grotti, & O. Ulturgasheva (Eds.). Animism in rainforest and tundra: Personhood in animals, plants, and things in contemporary Amazonia and Siberia, (pp.130-145). New York: Berghahn Books.
    31. Howe, N. (2019). Retelling trickster in Naapi’s language. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
    32. Justice, D. H. (2018). Why Indigenous literatures matter. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
    33. Kaviany, S. (2020). Plant ontologies among the Bribri of Talamanca, Costa Rica. En E. Halbmayer (Ed.). Amerindian socio-cosmologies between the Andes, Amazonia and Mesoamerica: Towards an anthropological understanding of the Isthmo-Colombian region, (pp.279-302). London: Routledge.
    34. Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous knowledge, scientific wisdom, and the teachings of plants. Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.
    35. Lapovsky Kennedy, E. (1972). The Waunan of the Siguirisua river: A study of individual autonomy and social responsibility with special reference to the economic aspects. (Doctoral Thesis). University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
    36. Leyva, X., Jorge, A., Hernández, R. A., Escobar, A., Köhler, A., Cumes, A., Mignolo, W. (2015). Prácticas otras de conocimiento(s): entre crisis, entre guerras. Buenos Aires: Clacso.
    37. Loewen, J. A. (1985). Developing moralnets: Twenty-five years of culture and change among the Choco. En D. L. Whiteman (Ed.). Missionaries, anthropology, and cultural change (part I) (Vol. publication number 25, pp.229-261). Department of Anthropology, Williamsburg: College of William and Mary.
    38. Machado Caicedo, M. L. (2011). La escultura sagrada chocó en el contexto de la memoria de la estética de África y su diáspora: ritual y arte. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
    39. Marker, M. (2003). Indigenous voice, community and epistemic violence: The ethnographer’s “interests” and what “interests” the ethnographer. Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(3), 361-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000086736
    40. Martínez Mauri, M. (2019). What makes the Gunas dules? Reflections on the interiority and the physicality of people, humans, and nonhumans. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 24(1), 52-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlca.12310
    41. Martínez Mauri, M. (2020). Things, life, and humans in Guna Yala (Panama): Talking about molagana and nudsugana inside and outside Guna society. En E. Halbmayer (Ed.). Amerindian socio-cosmologies between the Andes, Amazonia and Mesoamerica: Towards an anthropological understanding of the Isthmo-Colombian area, (pp.257-278). London: Routledge.
    42. Mauss, M. (1990 [1923]). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in Archaic societies. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, Inc.
    43. Meide, C. (1995, 27 April 1995). The dugout canoe in the Americas: An archaeological, ethnohistorical, and structural overview. Tallahassee: Florida State University.
    44. Niño Vargas, J. C. (2020). An Amerindian humanism: Order and transformation in Chibchan universes. En E. Halbmayer (Ed.). Amerindian socio-cosmologies between the Andes, Amazonia and Mesoamerica : Toward an anthropological understanding of the Isthmo-Colombian Area, , (pp.37-60). London: Routledge.
    45. Nordenskiöld, E. (1927). The Choco Indians of Colombia and Panama. Discovery, 8(95), 347-350.
    46. Oslender, U. (2019). Geographies of the pluriverse: Decolonial thinking and ontological conflict on Colombia’s Pacific coast. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109(6), 1691-1705. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1572491
    47. Overing, J., & Passes, A. A. (2000). Introduction: Conviviality and the opening up of Amazonian anthropology. En J. Overing & A. A. Passes (Eds.). The anthropology of love and anger: The aesthetics of conviviality in Native Amazonia (pp.1-30). New York: Routledge.
    48. Pardo Rojas, M. (1987). El convite de los espíritus. Quibdó: Ediciones Centro de Pastoral Indigenista.
    49. Peña, C. (2009). El mundo de los wounaan: categorías de vocabulario y perspectivas culturales. Panamá: Iglesia Evangélica Unida.
    50. Peña Ismare, C. (1997). Maach wounaanau nem sirnaa hau nʌm dʌ̈ i jemk’a nʌmpa k’ĩirpierr (La música de los wounaan y las ceremonias asociadas con cada estilo). Panamá: Iglesia Evangélica Unida.
    51. Peña Ismare, C., Velásquez Runk, J., Ismare Peña, R., & Carpio Opua, C. (2020). The wounaan haaihí jëeu nʌm ritual with the k′ugwiu: Reinforcing benevolence and preventing calamity. En E. Halbmayer (Ed.). Amerindian socio-cosmologies between the Andes, Amazonia, and Mesoamerica: Towards an anthropological understanding of the Isthmo-Colombian area. London: Routledge.
    52. Rahman, E. & Echeverri, J. A. (2015). Introduction. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America, 13(2), 1-10. https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/tipiti/vol13/iss2/1
    53. Ramos, A. R. (2012). The politics of perspectivism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 481-494.
    54. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145950
    55. Rappaport, J. & Ramos Pacho, A. R. (2012). Collaboration and historical writing: Challenges for the indigenous-academic dialogue. En F. E. Mallon (Ed.). Decolonizig native histories: Collaboration, knowledge, and language in the Americas, (pp.122-143). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    56. Reichel-Dolmatoff, G. (1960). Notas etnográficas sobre los indios del Chocó. Revista Colombiana de Antropología, IX, 73-158. http://biblioteca.icanh.gov.co/docs/MARC/texto/REV-0915v11a06.pdf
    57. República de Panamá. 2016. Ley 17 de 27 de junio de 2016. Que establece la protección de los conocimientos de la medicina tradicional indígena. Gaceta Oficial, 28063-B: 1-9
    58. Rival, L. (2012). Animism and the meanings of life: Reflections from Amazonía. In M. Brightman, V. E. Grotti, & O. Ulturgasheva (Eds.). Animism in rainforest and tundra: Personhood, animals, plants and things in contemporary Amazonia and Siberia, (pp.69-81). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
    59. Santos-Granero, F. (2010). Vital enemies: Slavery, predation, and the Amerindian political economy of life. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    60. Santos-Granero, F. (2012). Beinghood and people-making in native Amazonia: A constructional approach with a perspectival coda. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2(1), 181-211. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau2.1.010
    61. Simpson, L. B. (2017). As we have always done: Indigenous freedom through radical resistance. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    62. Stewart-Harawira, M. (2012). Returning the sacred: Indigenous ontologies in perilous times. En L. Williams, R. Roberts, & A. Mcintosh (Eds.). Radical human ecology: Intercultural and Indigenous approaches, (pp.73-90). New York: Routledge.
    63. Tallbear, K. (2019). Caretaking Relations: Not American dreaming. Kalfou, 6(1), 24-41. https://doi.org/10.15367/kf.v6i1.228
    64. Taussig, M. (1987). Shamanism, colonialism, and the wild man: A study in terror and healing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    65. Testart, A. (1998). Uncertainties of the “obligation to reciprocate”: A critique of Mauss’. In W. James & N. J. Allen (Eds.). Marcel Mauss: A centenary tribute, (pp.97-110). New York: Berghahn Books.
    66. Todd, Z. (2016). An indigenous feminist's take on the ontological turn: ‘Ontology’is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology, 29(1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12124
    67. Torres de Araúz, R. (1962). El chamanismo entre los indios chocóes. Hombre y Cultura, 1(1), 16-43.
    68. Velásquez Runk, J. (2017). Crafting wounaan landscapes: Art, identity, and environmental governance in Panama’s Darien. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
    69. Velásquez Runk, J. (2020). Decolonizing more-than-human académicoship, building collaboration. LASA Forum, 51(2), 94-98.
    70. Velásquez Runk, J., Ortíz Negría, G., Peña Conquista, L., Mejía Peña, G., Peña Cheucarama, F., & Cheucara Chiripua, Y. (2010). Landscapes, legibility, and conservation planning: multiple representations of forest use in Panama. Conservation Letters, 3, 167-176.
    71. Velásquez Runk, J., Peña Ismare, C., & Peña Conquista, T. (2019). Animal transferance and transformation among wounaan. Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 00(0), 1-20.
    72. Vidal, D. (2014 [1991]). The three Graces, or the allegory of the gift: A contribution to the history of an idea in anthropology. HAU: Journal fo Ethnographic Theory, 4(2), 339-368.
    73. Viveiros de Castro, E. (1998). Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4(3), 469-488.
    74. Walker, H. (2013). Under a watchful eye: Self, power, and intimacy in Amazonia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    75. Weiner, A. (1992). Inalienable possessions: The paradox of keeping-while-giving. Oakland: University of California Press.
    76. Williams, C. A. (1999). Resistance and rebellion on the Spanish frontier: Native responses to colonization in the Colombian Chocó. Hispanic American Historical Review, 79(3), 397-424.
    Tutoriales

    Autores:

    ¿Cómo enviar un artículo?

    Par evaluador:

    ¿Cómo evaluar un artículo?

    Información

    Palabras clave

    Código QR

    Número actual

    Más leídos en los últimos 30 días

    Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |