Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Characterization of roasted coffees from the ecotopo E-220A

Caracterizacion de cafés torrefactados, provenientes del ecotopo E-220A




Section
Artículo Original

How to Cite
Diaz, P., & Riaño, C. E. (2017). Characterization of roasted coffees from the ecotopo E-220A. NOVA, 15(28), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.22490/24629448.2074

Dimensions
PlumX
license

Licencia Creative Commons

NOVA by http://www.unicolmayor.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/nova is distributed under a license creative commons non comertial-atribution-withoutderive 4.0 international.

Furthermore, the authors keep their property intellectual rights over the articles.

 

P Diaz
    C E Riaño

      Background. Ecotopos are environments with well-defined soil, aquifer and environmental conditions, in which grains with quality characteristics are produced that captivate local and international markets. Objective. Physically and chemically correlate raw and roasted coffee beans from 2 zones of Ecotopo E-220A. Materials and methods. The research was carried out in four stages with Colombian varieties of supreme and extra special type, from the department of Nariño  of the municipalities of the Union and Buesaco, following an experimental design of random blocks with multivariate analysis, complemented with the technique of main components. Results. The study areas were correlated with the intrinsic characteristics of raw coffee - higher height, intense green color, larger, more uniform grain and higher titratable acidity. And at lower height, higher lipid content. The coffees of zone 2_ greater height_ have lower titratable acidity, lower lipid content, they present the greater loss of these during the roasting and generates roasted cafes of color between medium and light medium. Zone 1 due to its higher content of lipids produces more aromatic coffees. Likewise with the main components methodology it was determined that the loss of weight in roasted coffee, carbohydrates and apparent density explain the first component in 0.846, 0.745, 0.845 respectively and the second component groups the lipid content in 0.801 and The crude protein content at 0.620


      Article visits 204 | PDF visits 90


      Downloads

      Download data is not yet available.
      1. REFERENCIAS
      2. Gómez, L., Caballero, A. & Baldión, J. Ecotopos Cafeteros. Santafé de Bogotá, Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia; 1991. P. 221.
      3. Brains, D. Nariño Topographic 2.png. Nariño dept., 2012. Obtenido de: https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Narino_Topographic_2.png.
      4. FEDERACAFÉ. El Café de Nariño. Pasto, Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia; 2010. Obtenido el 18 de Agosto de 2014 de: http://www.cafedecolombia.com/: http://narino.cafedecolombia.com/es/narino/el_cafe_de_narino/
      5. Criollo, H.; Lagos, T., Bacca, T. & Muñoz, J.A. Caracterización de los sistemas productivos de café en Nariño, Colombia. Rev. U.D.C.A Act. & Div. Cient. 2016; 19(1): 105-113.
      6. Cliford, M. Coffee: botany, biochemistry and production of beans of beverage. En M. Cliford, & W. K. C. Chemical and physical aspects of green coffee and coffee products. London:Croom Helm Publishers Ltd. 1985. 305 – 374 p.
      7. Francesca, S., Guillou, C., Reniero, F., Ballarin,L., Cantagallo, M., Wieser, M., Iyer, S., Héberger, K. & Vanhaecke, F. Determination of the geographical origin of green coffee by principal component analysis of carbon, nitrogen and boron stable isotope ratios. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. (2005); Volume 19, Issue 15. P: 2111–2202.
      8. Silva, E., Mazzafera, P., Brunini, O., Sakai, E., Arruda, F., Mattoso, L. & Henrique, C. The influence of water management and environmental conditions on the chemical composition
      9. and beverage quality of coffee beans. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2005; 17(2):229-238.
      10. Serra, F., Guillou, C., Reniero, F., Ballarin, L., Cantagallo, M. I., Wieser, M., Iyer, S. S., Héberger, K., & Vanhaecke, F. Determination of the geographical origin of green coffee by principal component analysis of carbon, nitrogen and boron stable isotope ratios. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry.
      11. DaMatta, F., Ronchi, C. Maestri, M. & Barros. Ecophysiology of coffee growth and production. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2007; vol.19 no.4.
      12. FEDERACAFÉ. Nuestras Regiones cafeteras. Santafé de Bogotá, Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia; 2010d. Obtenido de http://www.cafedecolombia.com/: http://www.
      13. cafedecolombia.com/particulares/es/la_tierra_del_cafe/regiones_cafeteras/.
      14. FEDERACAFE. El café de Nariño. Factores Agroclimáticos. Santafé de Bogotá, Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia; 2010. Obtenido de http://narino.cafedecolombia.com/es/narino/el_cafe_de_narino/factores_agroclimaticos/
      15. FEDERACAFE. Nariño, Denominación de Origen. Los ciclos de cosecha en Nariño. Pasto, Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia; 2010. Obtenido el 5 de Septiembre de 2013, de http://cafedecolombia.com: http://narino.cafedecolombia.com/narino/solo_para_expertos/los_ciclos_de_cosecha_en_ narino/
      16. Díaz, P. Efectos de la altitud sobre la calidad del café torrefactado (Coffea arábica L. Var. Colombia) producido en los municipios de Buesaco y La Union – Nariño, pertenecientes
      17. al ecotopo E – 220 A. Tesis de grado, Programa de Ingenieria de Alimentos, Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia – UNAD; 2014.
      18. Montgomery, D. Diseño y análisis de experimentos. 2a. Ed. México D.F. Limusa Wiley; 2004. 692 p.
      19. Hou-Chun, L., Chen-Feng, Y., Chiou-Yun, C., Yu-Ching L. & Ming-Tsung, C. Geographic determination of coffee beans using multi-element analysis and isotope ratios of boron and
      20. strontium. Food Chemistry. 2014; Volume 142, 1: P. 439– 445.
      21. Puerta, G. Influencia del proceso de beneficio en la calidad de café. Revista Cenicafé. 1999; 50(1):78-88.
      22. Kitzberger, C., Dos, M., Scholz, S., Da Silva, B. & De Benassi, B. Profile of the diterpenes, lipid and protein content of different coffee cultivars of three consecutive harvests. AIMS Agriculture and Food. 2016; 254-264.
      23. Kitzberger, C.; Scholz, M.; Pereira, L.; Vieira, L.; Sera, T.; Silva, J. & Benassi, M. Diterpenes in green and roasted coffee of Coffea arabica cultivars growing in the same edapho-climatic
      24. conditions. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2013; v.30: 52-57.
      25. Jiménez, H.; Correa, E.; Diezma, B.; Diaz, V.; Meneses, B. & Oteros, R. Estudio de técnicas para la supervisión de calidad y clasificación de granos de café tostado: análisis de nuevas
      26. tecnologías. En: “VI Congreso Ibérico de Agroingeniería”, 05 - 07 SEPTIEMBRE 2011, Évora - Portugal. ISBN 978-972- 778-133-3.
      27. Bertrand, B., Boulanger, R., Dussert, S., Ribeyre, F., Berthiot, L., Descroix, F., Joët, T. Climatic factors directly impact the volatile organic compound fingerprint in green Arabica coffee
      28. seed as well as coffee beverage quality. Food Chem. 2012; 135 (4):2575–83.
      29. Arman, E., Guilmineau, F. & Melrose, J. Study of green coffee processing and brewing variability across species, origins, grades and time. Obtenido de: http://www.epamig.ufla.br/geosolos/publicacoes/2012/5.pdf.
      30. Consonni, R., Cagliani, R. & Cogliati, C. NMR based geographical characterization of roasted coffee. Talanta. 2012; 15; 88: 420-6.
      31. Bro, R., & Smilde, A. K. Principal component analysis. Analytical Methods. 2014; 6, 2812.
      32. Montavon, P., Duruz, E., Rumo, G. & Pratz, G. Evolution of green coffee protein profile with maturation and relationship to coffee cup quality. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003; 51:2328-2334.
      33. Macías, A & Riaño, C.E. Café orgánico: caracterización, torrefacción y enfriamiento. Cenicafé. 2002; 53(4): 281-292.
      34. Montavon, P., Mauron, A. & Duruz, E. Changes in green coffee protein profiles during roasting. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003; 51:2335-2343.
      35. OAC. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis. 18th Ed., Gaithersburg, MD, USA; 2005.
      36. Puerta, G. Calidad en taza de mezclas preparadas con granos de coffea arabica l. y c. canephora. Cenicafe. 2008; 59 (3): 183- 2003.
      37. Cagliani L., Pellegrino, G., Giugno, G. & Consonni R. Quantification of Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora var. robusta in roasted and ground coffee blends. Talanta. 2013; 15;
      38. :169-73.
      39. Riaño, C. Efecto de la humedad del café crudo en las propiedades del café tostado. Entramado. 2013; v.9 fasc: 214 – 222.
      40. Toledo, P., Pezza, L., Pezza, H. & Toci, A. Relationship Between the Different Aspects Related to Coffee Quality and Their Volatile Compounds. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2015; Volume 15, Issue 4: 705–719.
      41. Smith, L. A tutorial on Principal Components Analysis. In a handbook of statistical analysis using R. Chapter 13. Principal Component Analysis: The Olympic Heptathlon. 2002.
      42. Journée, M., & Nesterov, Y. Generalized power method for sparse principal component analysis. The Journal of Machine. 2010.
      43. Sánchez, A. Análisis de Componentes principales: Versiones dispersas y Robustas al ruido impulsivo. Proyecto fin de carrera. Departamento de Teoría de la Señal y Comunicaciones.
      44. Universidad Carlos III, Madrid. 2012.
      45. Riaño, C. Análisis en componentes principales -ACP en la identificación de elementos discriminatorios para caracterizar Coffea. 2do Encuentro Internacional de Matemáticas, Estadística y Educación Matemática. Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica De Colombia; 01 al 03 de agosto de 2013; Tunja, Colombia.
      46. Chatfield, C., Collins, A.J. Introduction to Multivariate Analysis. Chapman and Hall, London. 1980.
      47. Cattell, R.B. The screem test of the number of significant factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1966; 1: 140-161.
      48. Millan, J. and L. Yunda. An Open-Access Web-based medical image atlas for collaborative Medical image sharing, processing, Web Semantic searching and analysis with uses in medical training, research and second opinion of cases. 2014; Nova 12(22): 143-150.
      49. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22490/24629448.2074
      Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |