Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Microbiological indicators of contamination of the water sources

Indicadores microbiológicos de contaminación de las fuentes de agua



How to Cite
Microbiological indicators of contamination of the water sources. (2005). NOVA, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.22490/24629448.338

Dimensions
PlumX
license

Licencia Creative Commons

NOVA by http://www.unicolmayor.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/nova is distributed under a license creative commons non comertial-atribution-withoutderive 4.0 international.

Furthermore, the authors keep their property intellectual rights over the articles.

 

Mireya del Pilar Arcos Pulido
    Sara Lilia Ávila de Navia
      Sandra Mónica Estupiñán Torres
        Aura Cristina Gómez Prieto

          The growth of the population on aglobal scale has increased the levels of contamination. This contamination is related to the spilt one of waterof waste of domestic and industrial origin to the water bodies. In case of the residues of domestic origin, theload pollutant is represented by high percentages of organic matter and microorganisms of fecal origin. The control of the microbiological quality of the water of consumption and of waste, needs from analysis directedto determining the presence of pathogenic microorganisms, the agents involved in the water transmission arethe bacteria, virus and protozoan, they can cause illnesses at different levels of gravity, from a simple gastroenteritis up to fatal cases of diarrhoea, dysentery, hepatitis or fever typhoid.

          The diagnosis of these microorganisms, it needs specializing laboratories and represents several days of analysis and high costs. Asalternative to these disadvantages, the use of microbial indicators has been proposed that could identify bymeans of the use of simple, rapid and economic methods.The diagnosis and later recovery of the natural sources of water contaminated, it must do also, bearing inmind the implications that in terms of ecological and sanitary the degradation of the resource represents. Inthis sense, the perifitic microalga is constituted as good indicators of the state trophic of the ecosystems andanswers to the disturbances happened modifying his structure as for composition and plenty refers. This workdoes a review of the principal bioindicators of contamination and his meaning in the evaluation of the qualityof the water.


          Article visits 330 | PDF visits 5902


          Downloads

          Download data is not yet available.
          1. Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU), Departamento de Economía y Asuntos Sociales: División para el Desarrollo Sostenible. 1992. Agenda 21. En: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/spanish/agenda21spchapter18.htm
          2. Ramírez A, Viña G. Limnología colombiana, aportes a su conocimiento. Colombia. Fundación Universidad Jorge Tadeo Lozano; 2000. 293p.
          3. Burkholder J. Eutrophication and oligotrophication. En: ASHER S. (ed.) Encyclopedia of biodiversity. Academic Press. United States 2001; p. 649-670.
          4. Vargas C, Rojas R, Joseli J. Control y Vigilancia de la Calidad del Agua de Consumo humano. Textos Completos. CEPIS; 1996. 27p.
          5. OMS. Guías OMS para la Calidad del Agua de Bebida. Publicación Científica OPS; 1996. 481 p.
          6. OMS. Guías para la calidad del agua potable. OMS. Ginebra; 1995.
          7. Galárraga E. Algunos Aspectos relacionados con microorganismos en agua potable. Revista Politécnica de información técnica científica 1984; 9: 135-43.
          8. Prescott L, Harley J y Klein; D. Microbiología. Editorial McGraw-Hill. Madrid, España;1996.
          9. Rodríguez D. Enfermedades emergentes y reemergentes: amenaza permanente. RESUMED 2001; 14: 37-40
          10. Suarez C, Berdasquera D. Enfermedades Emergentes Y Reemergentes: Factores Causales Y Vigilancia. Rev Cubana Med Gen Integr 2000; 16:593-7.
          11. World Health Organization. Emerging Issues in Water and Infectious Disease WHO press. France.2003. 24 p.
          12. Guardabassi L, Dalsgaard A. Occurrence, structure, and mobility of Tn1546-like elements in environmental isolates of vancomycinresistant enterococci. Appl Environ Microbiol 1994; 70:984-90.
          13. Parveen S, Huq A, Aziz K. Antibiotic resistance patterns of Aeromonas spp. isolated from environmental and clinical sources. J Microbiol 1998; 5:25-9.
          14. World Health Organization and UNICEF. Water for life. Making it happen. France WHO press; 2005. 44 p.
          15. Campos C. Indicadores de contaminación fecal en la reutilización de aguas residuales para riego agrícola. Tesis doctoral. Facultad de Biología. Universidad de Barcelona. 1999. 250 p.
          16. Fernández A, Molina M, Alvarez A, Alcántara M, Espigares A. Transmisión fecohídrica y virus de la hepatitis A. Higiene y Sanidad Ambiental 2001; 1: 8-24.
          17. Pinilla G. Indicadores biológicos en ecosistemas acuáticos continentales de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia. Fundación Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Centro de Investigaciones; 1998. 67 p.
          18. Biggs B y Kilroy C. Stream Periphyton Monitoring Manual. Christchurch, New Zeland: NIWA for Ministry for the Environment; 2000. 131 p.
          19. Olivieri V. Bacterial indicators of pollution. En: Pipes W.O (ed.). 1982. Bacterial Indicators of Pollution. Boca Raton,
          20. Florida: CRP. Press, inc; 1982. p: 21-41.
          21. Craun G, Berger P, Calderón, R. Coliform bacteria and waterborne disease outbreaks. J. Am. Water Works Ass 1997; 89: 96-104.
          22. Rose J. Environmental ecology of Cryptosporidium and public health implications. Ann. Rev. Publ. Health, 1997; 18: 135-161.
          23. Steiner T, Thielman N, Guerrant R. Protozoal agents. What are the dangers for the public water-supply. Annu. Rev. Med 1997; 48: 329-340.
          24. Canosa A.. Indicadores bacteriológicos de eutrofización en los embalses de Chuza, Neusa y Tominé, y en la laguna de Chingaza. Bogotá, Colombia: Fundación Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Centro de Investigaciones Científicas 1995.
          25. Moore J, Heaney N, Millar B, Crowe M, Elborn J. Incidence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in recreational and hydrotherapy pools. Commun Dis Public Health 2002; 5: 23-26.
          26. Harwood V, Levine A, Scott T, Chivukula V, Lukasik J, Farrah S, Rose J. Validity of the indicator organism paradigm for pathogen reduction in reclaimed water and public health protection. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005; 71:316-70.
          27. Environment Agency. Standing Committee of Analysts, The Microbiology of Drinking Water - Part 1 - Water Quality and Public Health, Methods for the Examination of Waters and Associated Materials. United States: Environment Agency; 2002.
          28. Godfree A, Kay D, Wyer, M. Faecal streptococci as indicator of fecal contamination in water. Journal of Applied
          29. microbiology. Symposium Supplement 1997;83:110-119.
          30. Messer J, Dufour A. A Rapid, Specific membrane Filtration Procedure for Enumeration of Enterococci in recreational
          31. Water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 1998; 64: 678-80.
          32. Edberg S, Le Clero H, Robertson J. Natural protection of spring and well drinking water against surface microbial
          33. contamination. II. Indicators and monitoring parameters for parasites. Crit. Rev. Microbiol 1997; 23: 179-206.
          34. Rolim S. Sistemas de lagunas de estabilización. Bogotá: Mc Graw Hill;2000. 370 p.
          35. Collins C, Lyne P. Métodos microbiológicos. Ed, Acribia, Zaragoza, España; 1989.
          36. De Vicente A, Codina, J. Borrego C, Romero P. Relationship between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and bacteria indicators in polluted natural waters. Wat. Sc. Tech 1991;24: 121-24.
          37. Janda J, Duffey P. Mesophilic aeromonads in human disease: current taxonomy, laboratory identification and infectious disease spectrum. Reviews in Infectious Diseases. 1998; 10: 980-87.
          38. Ivanova E, Zhukova V, Gorshkova N, Chaikina E. Characterization of Aeromonas and Vibrio species isolated from a drinking water reservoir. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001;90: 919-27.
          39. Janda J. Recent advances in the study of the taxonomy, pathogenicity, and infectious syndromes associated with the genus Aeromonas. Clinical microbiology reviews 1991; 4: 397-410.
          40. Rippey S, Cabelli V. Use of thermotolerant Aeromonas group for the trophic classification of freshwaters. Water research 1989; 23:1107-14.
          41. World Health Organization. Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality. United States: World Health Organization; 2004.
          42. Monteil H, Harf M. Les infections à Aeromonas. Le Presse Médicale 1997; 37: 1790.1798.
          43. Janda J, Abbott S. Human Pathogens. In: Austin B et al., eds. The genus Aeromonas. London: Wiley; 1996. p: 151-173.
          44. Brooks G, Butel J, Morse S.
          45. Payment P, Larose Y, Trudel M. Polioviruses as indicator of virological quality of water. Can J Microbiol. 1979; 25:1212-4.
          46. Schwartzbrod L. Effect of human viruses on public health associated with the use of wastewater and sludge in agriculture an aquaculture. WHO Collaboration Centre for Microorganisms in wastewater. Geneva: Université de Nancy. World Health Organization; 178 p.
          47. Kott Y, Ben Ari H, Vinour L. Coliphages survival as viral indicator in various wastewater quality effluents. Pro Wat
          48. Tech 1978; 10: 337-46.
          49. Borrego J, Moriño M, De Vicente A, Córnax R y Romero P. Coliphages as an indicator of faecal pollution in water. Its relationship with indicator and pathogenic microorganisms. Water. Research 1987; 21: 1473-1480.
          50. Payan A, Ebdon J, Taylor H, Gantzer C, Ottoson J, Papageorgiou G, Blanch A, Lucena F, Jofre J, Muniesa M.
          51. Method for isolation of Bacteroides bacteriophage host strains suitable for tracking sources of fecal pollution in water.
          52. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005; 71:5659-62.
          53. Nelson K. Concentrations and inactivation of Ascaris eggs and pathogen indicator organisms in wastewater stabilization pond sludge. Water Sci Technol 2003;48:89-95.
          54. Margalef R. Limnología. Barcelona, España: Ediciones Omega.; 1992. 1010 p
          55. Roldán G. Fundamentos de limnología neotropical. Medellín, Colombia: Editorial Universidad de Antioquia; 1992. 529 p
          56. Curtis H. & N. Barnes. Biología. Buenos Aires: Editorial medica panamericana. Quinta edición; 1996. 1199 p.
          57. Liboriussen L.Production, regulation and ecophysiology of periphyton in shallow freshwater lakes. PhD Thesis. National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark. 2003. En: http://afhandlinger.dmu.dk
          58. Wetzel, R. Limnología. Barcelona: Ediciones Omega S.A; 1981. 679 p
          59. Rodrígues L, Bicudo B. Similarity among periphyton algal communities in a lentic-lotic gradients of upper Paraná river floodplain, Brazil. Rev. bras. Bot 2001;24(3):114-18.
          60. Naundorf, G. 2002. Las comunidades microbianas, fitoplanctónicas y perifíticas en ecosistemas acuáticos. Universidad del Cauca. Material del Curso Biota Acuática I. Popayán, Colombia: Maestría en Recursos Hídricos Continentales. 2002.
          61. Henry J, Fisher S. Spatial segregation of periphyton communities in desert streams: causes and consequences for N cycling. Journal of the American Benthologycal Society 2003; 22(4): 511-27.
          62. Roberts S, Sabater S, Beardall J. Benthic microalgal colonization in streams of differing riparian cover and light
          63. availability. Journal of Phycology 2004; 40(6): 1004-12.
          64. Andreu E, Camacho A. Recomendaciones para la toma de muestras de agua, biota y sedimentos en humedales Ramsar. Madrid- España:Ministerio del Medio Ambiente. Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza. Secretaria General del Medio Ambiente; 2002. 226 p
          65. Donato J, González L, Rodríguez C. Ecología de dos sistemas acuáticos de páramo. Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Bogota, D.C Colombia:.Colección Jorge Álvarez Lleras; 1996. 168 p.
          66. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22490/24629448.338
          Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |