Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

The ecosystem services of chocontá: an exercise of perception with their inhabitants

Los servicios de los ecosistemas de Chocante: un ejercicio de percepción con sus habitantes




Section
Artículo Original

How to Cite
The ecosystem services of chocontá: an exercise of perception with their inhabitants. (2011). NOVA, 9(16). https://doi.org/10.22490/24629448.500

Dimensions
PlumX
license

Licencia Creative Commons

NOVA by http://www.unicolmayor.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/nova is distributed under a license creative commons non comertial-atribution-withoutderive 4.0 international.

Furthermore, the authors keep their property intellectual rights over the articles.

 

Maritza Duque Gutiérrez
    Carlos Montes del Olmo

      This article proposes a new vision for the municipality of Chocontá, Cundinamarca (Colombia), to make an approach from ecological economics, in which, the social, economic and cultural make up a subsystem of the ecological system. In this municipality, the biodiversity of the three lower-ranking ecosystems it contains, generates various eco-services that contribute to the welfare of its inhabitants To characterize the identification of the services that biodiversity generates, were investigated on the perception of these different social actors of the mentioned territory. The results show the close links between human welfare and natural capital, which by processes of economic globalization, have been detrimental.

      Article visits 151 | PDF visits 774


      Downloads

      Download data is not yet available.
      1. Diaz S, Fargione J, Chapin F, Tilman D. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being, PLoS Biology, 2006; 4:1300-1305
      2. MA, millennium ecosystem assessment. (2003). Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment, Island Press, Washington, D.C. USA. 212 pp. URL: http://www.millenniumassesment.org/en/Framework.aspx
      3. Carpenter R, Mooney H, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries R, Diaz S, et. Al. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. PNAS 2009;106: 1305-1312.
      4. De Groot R, Fisher B, Christie, M y et al. (2010). The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity. En: Kumar, P. (Ed.), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. Earthscan, Londres
      5. Martin-Lopez B., E. Gomez-Baggethun, J.A. Gonzalez, P.L. Lomas, C. Montes. 2009a. The Assessment of Ecosystem Services Provided by Biodiversity: Re-Thinking Concepts and Research Needs. En: Handbook of Nature Conservation. Aronoff J.B. (Ed). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
      6. Duque, M. 2010. Gestionando el capital natural de la Sabana de Bogotá para el bienestar humano: una aproximacion a su concepcion como socioecosistema. Universidad Internacional de Andalucia. 2010
      7. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadistica (DANE), 2002. Sabana de Bogotá. Censo horticola 2002. URL: http://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/agropecuario/ena/Censo_Horticola_Bta_2002.pdf
      8. Asocolflores (2009). Colombian floriculture. Hoja de datos de la floricultura colombiana. URL: http://www.asocolflores.org/
      9. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, SENA, Corpoica (2006). Corredor tecnologico agropecuario para la Sabana Occidente. Bogotá, 22 pp. URL: http://www.unal.edu.co/viceinvestigacion/ct/corredoPlanestrategico.pdf
      10. Cepis 2005. url: http://www.cepis.ops.oms.org/eswww/fulltext/analisis/colombias/spcapit10.html
      11. Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, 2005. “Lineamientos de Politica para el manejo integral el agua”. http://www.col.opsoms.org/diia/2002/MINAMB_lineamientos.htm#775
      12. Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, 2001. Programa para el manejo sostenible y restauracion de ecosistemas de alta montana: paramos
      13. Dominguez, D. (1999). Hidrologia de Paramos, Modelacion de la cuenca alta del rio Blanco. Universidad de Los Andes, Departamento de Ingenieria Civil y Ambiental. Bogotá
      14. Jimenez AC, Cortes C E. “Cromo y sus compuestos”. En: “Enfermedades Profesionales: protocolos para su diagnostico”. Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social. Sociedad Colombiana de Medicina del Trabajo. Bogotá, Colombia. 1998
      15. Alcaldia Municipal de Choconta, 2011. Informe de gestión para la rendicion publica de cuentas sobre la garantia de los derechos de las ninas, los ninos, los adolescentes y los jóvenes. URL: http://choconta-cundinamarca.gov.co/apc-aa-files/38613735626339353361653063373163/INFORMEGESTIONINFANCIA.pdf
      16. Umana J. (2007). La Sabana de Bogotá y los ecosistemas relacionados en el 2007. (2007) FESCOL. URL: http://www.fescol.org.co/DocPdf/EV.FNA-SabanaBogotaEcosistemasRelacionados.pdf
      17. Bennett E Peterson G, Gordon L. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12: 1394-1404.
      18. Gordon L, Finlayson C, Falkenmark M. 2010. Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services. Agricultural Water Management, 97: 512-519.
      19. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22490/24629448.500
      Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |