Frequency of gastronintestinal parasite of dogs in public parks in two neighboring municipalities of state of Mexico
Frecuencia de parásitos gastrointestinales de perros en parques públicos de dos municipios vecinos del Estado de México
NOVA by http://www.unicolmayor.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/nova is distributed under a license creative commons non comertial-atribution-withoutderive 4.0 international.
Furthermore, the authors keep their property intellectual rights over the articles.
Show authors biography
Soil contamination by gastrointestinal parasites represents a global problem and a health risk. Objective. Determine the presence of parasites in dog feces in public parks in the area. Materials and methods. Stool samples were collected in 27 public parks in Metepec and Toluca Estado de México, which were processed with 3 parasitological techniques; 81.4% of public parks were positive for gastrointestinal parasites, with an overall sample rate of 16.5%. The percentage of parasitosis with zoonotic potential was 81.3%; Toxocara spp, Ancylostoma spp and Giardia spp were the zoonotic species identified. Conclusions. The results indicate that parks in the conurbed area of Toluca represent a major public health problem as they are a source of zoonotic gastrointestinal parasites of dogs.
Article visits 789 | PDF visits 420
Downloads
1. Overgaauw P, Van Zutphen L, Hoek D, et al. Zoono- tic Parasites in fecal samples and fur from dogs and cats in Netherlands. Vet Parasitol 2009;163:115- 122
2. Robertson ID, Irwin PJ, Lymbery AJ, et al. The role of companion animals in the emergence of parasi- tic zoonoses. International Journal for Parasitology 2000; 30:1369-1377
3. Quiroz H Parasitología y enfermedades parasita- rias de animales domésticos, Edit. Limusa, México, 2008.
4. Robertson ID, Thompson RC. Enteric parasitic zoonoses of domesticated dogs, Microbes and Infec- tion 2002;4:867-873
5. Machperson CM. The epidemiology and public health importance of toxocariasis: A zoonosis of glo- bal importance. International Journal for Parasitolo- gy 2013;43:999-1008
6. Zanzani S, Libera G, Scarpa P, et al. Intestinal pa- rasites of owned dogs and cats from Metropolitan and Micropolitan areas; Prevalence, zoonotic risks, and pet owners awarenes in Nothern Italy. BioMed Reserch International 2014;2014; 1-10
7. Bugg R, Robertson I, Elliot D, Thompson C. Gastrointestinal parasites of urban dogs in Per- th, Western Australia. The Veterinary Journal 1999;157:295-301
8. Polo T L, Cortés V J, Villamil J C, et al. Contami- nación de los Parques Públicos de la localidad de Suba, Bogotá con nemátodos zoonóticos, Rev. Salud Publica 2007;9:550-557
9. Castillo D, Paredes C, Zañartu C, et al. Contamina- ción ambiental por huevos de Toxocara spp. en algu- nas plazas y parques públicos de Santiago de chile, 1999; Bol. Chil. Parasitol 2000;55:86-91
10. Martínez BI, Gutierrez CEM, Alpízar SEA, et al. Contaminación parasitaria de heces de perros, recolectadas en la Ciudad de San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas, México. Vet. Mex 2008;39:173-180
11. Martínez BI, Fernández PA, Vázquez TO, et al. Frecuencia de Toxocara canis en perros y áreas verdes del sur de la ciudad de México, Distrito Federal, Vet Méx 1998;29:239-244
12. Romero NC, García CA, Mendoza MG, et al. Contaminación por Toxocara spp. En parques de Tul- yehualco, México, Revista científica, FCV-LUZ 2009;XIX:253-256
13. Romero NC, Mendoza MD, Bustamante LP y col. Presencia y viabilidad de Toxocara spp en suelos de parques públicos, jardines de casas y heces de perros en Nezahualcóyotl, México. Revista Científica, FCV-Luz 2011;XXI:195-201
14. INEGI, Censo de Población y vivienda, Instituto Nacional de Geografía y Estadística, http://www.censo2010.org.mx. Ultimo acceso 13 Septiembre de 2014.
15. Duorado C, Ferreira J, Talamini A, et al. A new laboratorial method for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasites in dogs. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. Jaboticabal 2013;22:1-5
Information
Keywords
