Saltar para menu de navegação principal Saltar para conteúdo principal Saltar para rodapé do site

Enforcing Foreign Judgments – Principle Points from The Viewpoint of the Execution of the Right



Como Citar
Enforcing Foreign Judgments – Principle Points from The Viewpoint of the Execution of the Right. (2017). Misión Jurídica, 10(12), 31-45. https://revistas.unicolmayor.edu.co/index.php/mjuridica/article/view/553

doi
Dimensions
PlumX
##articleSummary.license##

DERECHOS RESERVADOS DE AUTOR

Todo documento incluido en la revista puede ser reproducido total o parcialmente, siempre y cuando se respete su contenido original, se cite la fuente y se use con fines académicos no comerciales. Misión Jurídica y su contenido se encuentra protegido bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.

Licencia Creative Commons
Misión Jurídica por Misión Jurídica se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Basada en una obra en http://unicolmayor.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/mjuridica/index.
Permisos que vayan más allá de lo cubierto por esta licencia pueden encontrarse en http://unicolmayor.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/mjuridica/index.

Petar Georgiev Bonchovski

    Petar Georgiev Bonchovski

    Lawyer, graduated with Master Degree from the Free University of Bourgas, Bulgaria, PhD in Civil Procedure from the Higher Attestation Commission at the Ministry of Edu- cation and Science, Bulgaria. Research fellow in the Institute of Legal Studies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences specializing in international civil procedure, European civil procedu- re, national and international arbitration. Teacher in Civil Procedure. Counselor. 


    The aim of the paper is to address the nature and the importance of the activity resulting in the issuance of the formula of the coercive execution based on recognized foreign judgments. The function of the formula is to prevent infringement of parties’ rights and obligations in the course of the execution process due to misunderstandings of the ruling in the foreign judgment by the enforcement authorities, etc. In virtue of this specifics, it is considered that the judge, granting recognition and adapting the formula of the resolution of the material dispute to the national legal system, is the most appropriate authority to order also the formula of the execution together with the recognition. Based on these considerations, conclusions are drawn about the types of litigation for recognition and enforcement, the legal construction of the recognition, the legal effects, the application of the new European Union regulation.


    Visualizações de artigos 124 | Visitas em PDF 79


    Downloads

    Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.
    1. Law on Civil Procedure Rules. Published in the State Gazette # 31 of 8th of February 1892 (abolished).
    2. Law on Civil Procedure Rules. Published in the State Gazette # 246 of 1th of February 1930 (abolished).
    3. Code of Civil Procedure. Published in the State Gazette # 59 of 8th of February 1952 (abolished).
    4. Code of Civil Procedure. Published in the State Gazette # 59 of 20th of July 2007, in force from the 1st of May 2008.
    5. Code on International Private Law. Published in the State Gazette # 42 of 17th of May 2005, in force from the 21st of May 2008.
    6. Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Counsel on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32012R1215.
    7. Projects for a convention and the reports of the Working Group on the Judgments Project (The Hague Conference on Private International Law). Retrieved from: http://conflictoflaws.net/News/2015/03/Proyecto-mundial-La-Haya.pdf.
    8. The ‘Heidelberg’ Report (StudyJLS/C4/2005/03), http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/news/docs/study_application_brussels_1_en.pdf.
    9. Barnett, P. Resjudicata, Estoppel, andForeignJudgments. United Kingdom, OxfordUniversityPress, Oxford, 2001.
    10. Bonchovski. P. The Subject of the Procedure for Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgment, Правна Мисъл, Bulgaria, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, 2005, No 3. 34-45.
    11. Bonchovski, P. The Legal Effects of the Decision of Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in the Light of the Requirements of the Protection of the National Sovereignty. Bulgaria, Юридически свят, Sofia, CIBI, 2008, book 1.
    12. Bonchovski, P.Free Circulation of Judgments (The Republic of Bulgaria and the European Union). Bulgaria,Institute of Legal Studies-Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, 2016.
    13. Bower, S, Turner, A. & Handley, K. The Doctrine of Res Judicata.United Kingdom, Butterwords & Co (Publishers), 3rd Ed., London-Edinburgh-Dublin, 1996.
    14. Cappelletti, M., Perillo, J.CivilProcedureinItaly. Netherlands, MartinsNijnoff, TheHague, 1965.
    15. Chernev, S. (1999, № 6).ThepowerofcoerciveexecutionaftertheamendmentsinCPC (StateGazette # 64, 1999).Търговско право, Bulgaria, Sofia, 20-30.
    16. Geimer, R.Internationales Zivilprozeßrecht. Germany, Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt, 4., neubearbeitete u. erweiterte Auflage, Köln, 2001.
    17. Jauering, O. Zwangsvollstreckungs- und Konkursrecht. Germany, Verlag C. H. Beck, 20. völlig neubearbeitete Auflage des Friedrich Lent begründeten Werkes, München, 1996.
    18. Linke, H.InternationalesZivilprozeßrecht, LeitfragenfürVerfahrenmitAuslandsbezug. Germany, VerlagDr. OttoSchmidt, 3. völlig überarbeiteteAuflage, Köln, 2001.
    19. Matscher, F.
    20. DieAnerkennungundVollstreckunggerichtlicherEntscheidungenimVerhältniszwischen ÖsterreichundGroßbritannien. Austria, JuristischeBlätter, Wien. 1963 Heft 9/10 und 21/12.
    21. Nagel, H. und Gottwald, P.Internationales Zivilprozeßrecht. Germany, Aschendorff Rechtsverlag, 5., neubearbeitete Auflage, Münster, 2002.
    22. Richmann, W. M. and Reynolds W. L.Understanding Conflict of Laws. USA, Matthew Bender & Co., INC, 2nd ed., New York, 1993.
    23. Rosenberg, L. undSchwab, K.Zivilprozeßrecht.Germany, C. H. Beck Verlag, 11. Auflage, München, 1974.
    24. Schack, H.Internationales Zivilverfahrensrecht.Germany, Verlag C. H. Beck, 3, neubearbeitete u. erweiterte Auflage, München, 2002.
    25. Schütze, R.Die Anerkennung und Vollstreckung ausländischer Zivilurteile in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland als verfahrensrechtliches Problem. Germany, Doktorarbeit, unveröffentlicht, 1960.
    26. Sier, K.Das Internationale Privatrecht der Schweiz. Switzerland, Schulthess Juristische Medien AG, Zürich-Basel-Genf, 2002.
    27. Walter, G. Vollstreckungsrecht. Walter de Gruyter & Co, 2. Auflage, Berlin, 1974.
    28. Zöller, R./Bearbeiter.Zivilprozeßordnung. Germany, Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt, 21. Auflage, Köln, 1999.
    Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |