EAVESDROPPING IN THE IRANIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
ESCUCHAS EN EL SISTEMA JUDICIAL PENAL IRANÍ
COPYRIGHT PROVISIONS
Every papper included in the magazine can be reproduced whole or in part, provided that respect for its original content, the source is acknowledged and is used with non-commercial academic. Legal mission and its content is protected under a license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-
Misión Jurídica is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivar 4.0 International License.
Based on a work in http://unicolmayor.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/mjuridica/index.
Permits that go beyond what is covered by this license can be found at http://unicolmayor.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/mjuridica/index.
Show authors biography
That the individual shall have full protection of property and of the integrity of apersonis a principle as old as the human being’s life, but it has been found necessary from time to time to define anew the exact nature and extent of such protection. As civilization advanced, it was argued that, an individual’s feelings and intellect, as well as his physical being, came within the scope of the legal “right to be let alone.”
Iranian Constitution has guaranteed individual’s rights and freedom in article 9. So, when intrusion to eavesdropping is allowed, adequate safeguards should be provided to protect the individual’s rights. The balance approach to the problem of government intrusions into private lives appeals to common sense, but it is difficult to apply. Iranian Constitution has explicitly referred to forbiddance of eavesdropping and interception of conversations in its article 25. Article 582 of Islamic Penal Code ratified in 1996 has criminalized eavesdropping by the governmental officials. Article 104 of Criminal Procedure Code refers to the eavesdropping under the judge’s order. The latter code abolished by article 150 of new criminal procedure code ratified in 2014, which will come into force in October 2014.
Article visits 141 | PDF visits 51
Downloads
1 .Akhoondi. M. (2009) Criminal Procedure, Volume 4, Majd Publications, Tehran. Iran.
2 . Ashouri. M. (2009) Criminal Procedure, Volume 2, Samt Publications, Tehran. Iran.
3 . Blair. A. L. & Jernigan. W. (1980) Criminal Procedure, Washington and Lee Law Review, 37. P. 510-595.
4 .Donnelly, R. C. (1963) Electronic eavesdropping,Notre Dame Law Review, 38. 667.
5 . Haji Zade, H. r. & Motavalli. Y. (2004) Criminal Procedure code in the current legal order, Khatte Sevvom Publications, Tehran. Iran.
6 . Hashemi, M.(2011) Constitutional law and political structure, Mizan Publications, Tehran. Iran.
7 . Joubert, C, (1995) National and International aspects of Undercover Policing, The Police Journal, 68. p. 305-318.
8 . Kooshki. G. (2007) Protection of Privacy, Judiciary law Journal, 1. 71, New Series, p. 135-150.
9 . Lapidus. E. J. (1974)Eavesdropping on trial, Hayden Book Company.
Nohlen, Nicolas, Germany: The Electronic Eavesdropping Case
10 . Madani.J. (1990) Constitutional law in the Islamic republic of law, vol. 7. Soroosh Publications, Tehran. Iran.
[1][1] . Madani, J. Criminal Procedure, Paydar Publications, Tehran. Iran.
12 . Motameni Tabatabaei. M. (2011) Constitutional law, Mizan Publications,Tehran. Iran.
13 . Nohlen, N. (2005) Germany: The Electronic Eavesdropping Case,International Journal of Constitutional Law, 3, Issue 4. P. 680-685.
14 . Pad, E, (2006) Private criminal law, Daneshvar Publications, Tehran. Iran.
15 . Qazi Shariat Panahi. A, (2012) Precise of Constitutional Law, Mizan Publications, Tehran. Iran.
16 . Stratford. J. QC&Johnston. T. (2014) The Snowden Revelations: Is GCHQ Breaking the Law, European Human Rights Law Review. 2. P. 129-144.
17. Tadayyon. A. Obtaining evidence in criminal procedure, Mizan Publications, Tehran. Iran.
Misión Jurídica is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International License. </ A >
ISSN 1794-600X - Print version
