The dynamic burden of proof in the retirement proceedings due to a call for service qualification. Progress or regression?

La carga dinámica de la prueba en los procesos de retiro por llamamiento a calificar servicio, ¿avance o retroceso?

The article explains the call to qualify service from its normative foundation, states its differences with the discretionary removal, details the way in which the Public Force must exercise its discretionary power in relation to the motivation of the administrative acts of dismissal of the uniformed officers who are disengaged based on the aforementioned reasons and indicates how the dynamic burden of proof operates in these processes when they are under the cognizance of the Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction. This document analyses the jurisprudence produced by the Constitutional Court of Colombia on the subject and portrays the conflict generated within the Corporation due to the lack of motivation in the administrative act of retirement for a  call to qualify  service in the Public Force, due to the risk of violation of the fundamental constitutional right to a fair process for the police and the military officers who have been disengaged for this cause, who, in addition to not knowing the reasons for their dismissal, must prove that their disengagement is due to an act of misuse of power.